english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Haupt arrow newsitems arrow French Opposition Leader Wauquiez to EF: Heritable Gene Editing=>+NO Artificial Births for Lesbians

French Opposition Leader Wauquiez to EF: Heritable Gene Editing=>+NO Artificial Births for Lesbians

Geschrieben von ACM
Wednesday, 23 January 2019

 french_christiandemocratepp_opposition_leader_wauquiez_to_agg_eurofora_400

*Holtzeim(near Strasbourg's Airport)/Republican Party Meeting/Angelo Marcopolo/- The recent row after a US-Lobby linked Chinese doctor Manipulated Genetically 2 Human Embryos, in an Artificially monitored Birth of  2 Girls, provoked a Heritable, Irreversible Alteration of their GermLine, affecting Future Generations too, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/heritablegenemaniptrumpxihumanity.html, etc), Highlighted the Greater and Sooner than Expected Dangers that could have for Human Race the eventual Authorisation of Artificially obtained (instead of Natural) Births in the case also of Lesbians, as some had earlier pushed to plan f.ex. in France too, the Leader of the French mainstream Center-Right Opposition, Experienced former Minister for Europe and Science/Research, currently President of the Republican Party (ChristianDemocrats/EPP), Laurent Wauquiez agreed, in substance, with "Eurofora", at a Press contact after his Speech to a Public Meeting at Holtzeim, near Strasbourg's Airport.      

 

french_republical_leader_wauquiez_welcomed_by_people_at_holtzeimstras_eurofora_400
                    

 

- By a Timely Coincidence, Waquiez had just Declared his crystal-clear Opposal to controversial plans to allow in France such Artificially obtained Births of Kids at the Demand of Lesbians, only a few Weeks' Time before, at the end of November 2018, a Chinese Doctor linked to USA Lobbies related with former "Socialist"/Dem. POTUS Barack Hussein Obama's Administration, announced at  Hong Kong that, by abusing of the New Gene-Editing Technology of "CRISP-9", he had managed to Definitively Alter the GermLine of 2 Artificially born babies for ever.

- A Chinese Minister strongly Condemned such an UnPrecedented move, Both as UnEthical, illegal, and Dangerous. But in the USA, widespread Citicism was UnEqual, with some "Social                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ist"/Dems, former Obama's Lobbies pushing towards a Conditional Green Light... New US President Don Trump made Recently a symbolic Critical public Declaration, at the Annual bipartisan National Breakfast with Christians for 2019, pleading in favor of the "UnBorn Child" (Human Embryo) "created at the Image of God", (while also repeatedly Prolonging his Top Talks with Chinese President XI, officially focused on Foreign Trade). Xi, at a subsequent trip in Europe, chose to speak with Franco-German Leaders Macron and Merkel, as well as EU Commission's President Juncker, also about "Challenges faced by Humanity" nowadays, without explicitating. Meanwhile, in Europe, where CoE's BioEthical Convention (not yet ratified by several countries) already Condemns any attempts to Modify the Human GermLine, the Biggest Political Group in EU Parliament, that of ChristianDemocrats/EPP, pushed a Draft Resolution against Heritable Genetic Editing, while MEPs organized a Debate with EU Commission recently calling for "a Global Ban".

 >>> It's in this Context that Wauquiez became a kind of Pioneer, among critical European Political Leaders, by rushing to Critically Declare, already as Early as since the 18 November 2018 in Paris, his crystal-clear Opposal to Artificial methods to fabricate Kids for Lesbians, mainly Because it would bring "a Merchandisation of Human Gametes", with "Sperm Banks", etc., where Customers could go Shoping for the various Characteristics of Kids to be born by Artificial methods : This had been already prepared by the NAZI, and was called Eugenism", he sternly reminded...

- But, "I don't want Eugenism in the Future of French Society !", vowed Wauquiez then, widely applauded.

+ Meanwhile, a Large Majority of French People in a Public Consultation at the Internet, organized in 2018 on the occasion of the regular Review of BioEthical Laws each 4 Years, had Massively Rejected (with a lot of various Arguments) any attempt to allow Artificial fabrication of Children for Lesbians.

=> All these critical Developments, as well as the proximity of Crucial EU Elections on May 2019, apparently incited the French President Macron, who had been previously pressed by a LGBTI Lobby to initially accept a kind of Artificial fabrication of Children for Lesbians in the Past, to, later-on Postpone such a Divisive Measure, risking to Provoke more Tensions, sine die, (at least until After the 2019 EU Elections+, which are, however, closely Followed also by Local, Regional and Presidential/Legislative Elections, during 2019-2022)...

---------------------------

However, some commentators (particularly at the Establishment's Medias, etc), Rushed to Attack President Wauquiez for his above-mentioned Criticism against Artificial fabrication of Children for Lesbians, which involved also a reminder of NAZI's abhorrent Eugenism (Comp. Supra).

>>> But, in the Meantime, inter alia, also the above-mentioned Developments revealed that, in Fact, this "Hot" Topical Issue is Not Only a question of pure Ethics and Morals, but also an elementary and Topical Need to Urgently Defend all Humankind, from any Risk to Artificialy create some kind of "Different" Beings and/or, more or less, "Other Races", (particulraly IF such Technologies, sooner or fell into the Wrong Hands)...

                                                                                                                                                                                            french_mainstream_opposition_leader_wauquiez__agg_eurofora_400

=> That's why "Eurofora" asked Today Laurent Wauquiez if he found that those Recent Developments, about the, 1st in History, InHeritable and Irrevesible Genetic Manipulations which can Affect also the Future Generations, (Comp. Supra), in fact, Justified and Strengthened even Further his Critical Stance, against Artificial Fabrication of Children with Genetic Technologies for Lesbians.


- "Yes !", clearly Replied President Laurent Wauquiez to the above-mentioned "Eurofora"'s Question, after taking, initialy, some time to Carefuly Hear and Think about what exactly we were saying.

- "You are Right", he confirmed, with emphasis, on the Key-point of what is really at Stake (Comp. Supra).

+ Indeed, such kind of "BioEthical Issues, have become, Nowadays, even More Important", than before, the Leader of France's ChristianDemocrat/EPP mainstream Political Opposition acknowledged.

=> Wauquiez's subsequent Decision to include the Young Philosophy Professor François-Xavier Bellamy among the 3 Leaders of the "Republican" Party's List of Candidates to the European Elections of May 2019, obviously is a consequence of the above-mentioned Acknowledgment, since, inter alia, Bellamy is notoriously interested on BioEthics, and even, reportedly, considers a Legislative Bill seeking to Allow the use of Genetic Technologies for Artificial Births in the case of Lesbians, etc., as "the Last Border before TransHumanism"....

- As a matter of General Principle, such kind of Crucial Big Issues for People's Future, (as Key BioEthical matters, Mass Migration, Identity, Security, Economic Development, and Europe, etc.), must Not be Abandoned "to Bureaucrats" or Technocrats, since "We Refuse any such <<Submission>> as that which is Denounced by (World-Famous Writer) Michel Houellebecq", (in his homonymous Book, published almost at the Same Time that the 1st Brutal Massacre by Islamist Terrorists cowardly targetting Civilian People, was notoriously committed, back on January 2015, against "Charlie Hebdo"'s Journalists in Paris), Wauquiez Urged in Key points of his Speech, widely applauded.

 

french_republican_leader_wauquiez_meeting_at_holtzeim_strasbourg__eurofora_400 

 

(../..)

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Besucher: 57603280

Archive

Login Form





Daten merken

Passwort vergessen?
Noch keinen Account? Account anlegen

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Resultate

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.