english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged

French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged

Escrito por ACM
21.04.22

 

debate_macron__marine_le_pen_2022_health_point_france_2__eurofora_400 


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/-    Astonishingly, the Most Important Topical Issue Nowadays : that of the way to face èhe Deadly Virus' Pandemic, was kept ptacticaly Out of the Public Debates pf the Crucial Fnal Round in the current French Presidential Election. But when it did interfere, it trigered a Sharp Criticism  against the way that the Incubent Admioistration attempted to Impose a Few Controversial Fake "Vaccines' on the People, to the Detriment of Both its Human Right to Chose, and of Medical Workers' Liberty, as well as of the efficiency of the Health Protection System...     

========================

    First of all,  WHO Announced several Exceptional 'Problems" Hinfering a normal information gathering Nowadays, particularly on Europe.

who_problems_in_eu_during_french_presidential_election_2022_who_eurofora_400_01 

Moreover, a Special WHO's Web-Page for our Area of the World,  revealed that relevant "Data" on European Coutries were now, Suddenly, ..."14 Days" Old (sic !), i.e. a Black Out almost Equivelant and Coicidng with the Crucial Final Round  the current Frech Presdental Elections' process, concluding on April 24...

who_black_out_14_days_on_eu_during_french_presidential_election_2022_who_eurofora_400 

Meanwhile, Challenger Marine Le Pen Complained for Incubent President Macron's Refusal of any Public Debate with him during the 1st Round of the Election. And when he, immediately Afterwards, Vsited Strasbourg's Region, he Skinded any Health-related Issue from a widely Publicized Speech on "Europe'here, by Restrictng the 1st into an Osbur Military Hospital at FarAway Muhlouse City... Last, but not leat; the Only Official Publc Debate between the 2 Finalist Candidates, on April 20, Despite a Log Time Duration, Icluding Various Other Topcal Issues, Surprisingly, did Not Deal with Any "Virus Pandemic" specific Issue, at all. (It Only added a Vague and Short mention about "Hospitals" in general)...

who__virus_record_during_ukrania_conflict_who__eurofora_400 

+ Paradoxicaly, an even more Surprizing Fact is that the current Ukranian Conflict, which has practicaly Monopolized the Establishment Medias' Attention during the Letest Weeks, occured almost at the Same Time with a Record-High Augmentation of Virus' Infections, Hospitalisations and Deaths, throughout Many Countries, which Risks to go practicaly UnNoticed, by the Publlic Opinion, particularly ion Europe and the USA, (i.e., by a Coincidence, there where the Copntroversial Fake-'Vaccines" notoriously have a quasi-Monopol)... It's Obvious that, in that way, inter alia, several Recent Developments Revealing various Limts, Imperfections, Counter-Indications, Gaps, Inadequacies, Unefficiencies, or Risks around those Fake-"Vaccines", may Not be percieved by the People fully and/or on time. And rrecent WHO ot other International Developments have, indeed, already started to Reveal maifold Failures in the Contrversial Pseudo-"Vaccines", Affectiong the Human Genome (mRNA + Virus' Vector, etc), Contrary to "Classic" Vaccines, similar to those tested and used Since Louis Pasteur's ionvention, during almost 2 Centuries.

who__virus_peak_during_ukrania_conflict__all_but_europe_who__eurofora_400 

Thus, inter alia, it's also the Growing Controversies on various possibly Negative Side-Effects of such Fake "Vaccines", the Fact that their Recipients are Not Always Protected from Infections, Hospitalisations or even Deaths, while they can even Infect Other People (as "Silent Killers"), added to an Unsustainable Obligation to Add More and more "Doses', 'Bousters", etc., each time, after only 3 or more Months, and/or fori each Variant, etc., (while Some can even be "Individualized" ...sic !), stand inevitably behind their Failure...

Such a curiously Stuborn Insistence to Stick to a Few and Failed Human Genome Affecting Tools goes as Far as to Exclude, in the EU, USA, etc, any Other Kind of Vaccine against COVID, and particularly those "Classic' Vaccines, faithful to Pasteur's well-Tested Idea during 2 Centuries,    ² (i.e. the Majority of Currently Tested Vaccine Projects against COVID), Even if thy have been Nowadays Authorized by tje WHO, (Already at least 3 of them)...

Moreover, whenever "Eurofora" raised a Question about a Hope to Authorize any "Classic' Vaccine against COVID soon enough, (f.ex. at Video-Press Conferences of EU Heads of State/Governements' Summits, of EU Parliament, or  at the French Ministry of Health, etc), there was Never Any concrete Positive Answer... (See, f.ex., at: ... + ... + ..., etc).  And a Last-Minute, Delayed Additon of Only 1 Other "Vaccine", Pretexting that it would be "More Classical' than the Others (Comp. Supra), so that it might Ease People's above-mentioned Fears, on the Contrary, in Fact; it concerned an Obscure USA-made tool, using ...Insects' (sic !) Eggs Geneetic Manipulations, and a "Chimera"-like Transpositon to Humans, Earlier presented by its own Inventors  as an example of ..."Gene Therapy" Novel Tools, (i.e. Nothng to do with Pasteur"s really "Classic" Vaccnes).

=> So that, in Addition to the so-called "Anti-Vaccine" People, there were, Also, many Other People, who would Like to have a good "Classic" Vaccine against the Pandemic, Pasteur-like, Bt were -and Still are- Deprived from it, Against their wish : I.e., to the "Anti-Vaccine" Movement was added those who were, UnWillingly, Refused any Vaccine of their Free Choice, i.e. "Refusnics"...

>>> Such Strange Blunders incited even the President of the "League for Freedom of Vaccinations", a Long-Time Respectable Huma Rights body,  John-Paul Zudier, launch a vibrant call to "Vote for Marine" on 2à22, as the prestigious Newspaper "Le Monde"  observed.

    - Indeed, Marine Le Pen denounced Emmanuel Macron's part of responsibility for "Bullying the Non-Vaccined People", as she called, inter alia, also an unusual, clumsy and isulting Expression, (related to "Shit !", etc), Exceptionaly abused by Macron in Public, for a large Group of People, Against whom; in Fact, an Unprecedented and Dangerous, wider "Hate Speech" emerged Recently in some Countries' Establishment, amidst various Discriminatory and Oppressive Measures, related to the Deadly Pandemic. -"He (the incumbent President Macron) even called us (the Political Opposition) ...;"UnVaccinators" (Sic !).., further Complained Challenger Marine Le Pen.

-----------------------------------------

    + But the Sharpest Denonciation was that Against the "Absolutely Awful" measure to "Fire more than 15.000 Health Workers, withOut Salaries", under the Pretext that "they were Not Vaccinated, as you Required, at Any Price",... Marine Criticized.

    => In consequence, - "I (if Elected) will ReIntegrate them All, and ReImburse the Salaries tha they were Deprived from !", she clearly Vowed.

    Many Victims of such Abuses, by the competent Ministers, Not Only in France, but Also in Other Countries, (as, f.ex., Greece, Italy, USA, etc), have Already lodged  various  Legal Applications to the Courts, including the ECHR in Strasbourg, while in the USA; the Supreme Court, at Washington DC, Recently OutLawed (with a Big Majority) a Similar Opressive Measure concerning Many Jobs at the Private Sector;, (Clearing  anOther one, Limited to Publc Sectors' Hospitals, But Only with just 1 Vote Difference out of 7).

    Exceptionaly, Macron did Not even Reply to such a Heavy Accusation, and Loud Announcement, prefering to Speak about Other Matters...

    Establishment's Medias had Already Censored recently 3 Times Marine's Announcement on the Fired Health Workers in order to Impse a few Fake "Vaccines", since Marine had spoken about it at a Popular Meeting in Avignon, during this 2nd Round, but it's not sure that they might do the same Even after the Unique Public Debate between the two Finalist Candidates... Meanwhile, it was taken over Also by a Dispute between the National Rally's interim President, MEP Jordan Bardela and Cotroversial Health Minister Olivier Veran, where the First Prognosticated that 'we shall probably Discover Many things (i.e. Scandals) during the Next few Years'...

    Controversial Veran seems to be an Interesting lead towards Possible Scandals, since, inter alia, in Addition to his role at the HCQ "Lancet-Gate" Blunder (See f.ex.: ..., etc), he was a Supletif, as MP, of Former "Socialist" Health  Minister Mrs Fioraso at Grenoble, Notorious for her Stuborn Insistence to Submit Human Embryos to Genetic Manipulations; under Former "Socialist" President Hollande, (See, f.ex.: ..., etc), and Wife of a Bio-Technocrat. LGBT-Friendly, Speaking English, with an Homonymous Big-Pharma Company in th USA ("Veran Medical" nowadays Focusing on Research about "Pulmonary" Issues, after having got the responsibility on the COVID Pandemy since the Beginning of 202O at the French Ministry of Health since the Beginning of 2020, he appears to be a Key to Macron's failure for France or Europe to "Find the Antidot" to COVID, as he had  Dreamed Initialy (See: ...)...  As for his Current Claim, that France and tje EU would "Produce and Export the Most Vaccines" against the Virus, it doesN' realy look Better than a Poor Country like ...India, which, Notoriously,  Also Simply puts a Liquid, Invented by Others, inside small tubes, Spread across the World, But has Also Invented its own Vaccine, (a "Classic', Pasteur-like product), already Authorized by the WHO ! Compared to that, just Copy and Paste a USA - Turkish "Uhgur" Controversial Fake "Vaccine", probably pushed by the Amerikan Pentagon, as also Controvrsi "Remdesivir" or "Moderna", since the "Ebola" African Crisis, while the Numerous USA-Army linked "Bio-Labos", Notoriously Spread &ccross the World, full of "Bio-Weapons", Near Foreign Borders, surfaced Nowadays up to the UN SC, by Russia, China, a.o., as f.ex. near Mainz, at the Fraco-German Borders, from where comes the Key-part of Pfizer's Human Genome Affecting Controversial Tool, (close to the HQ of USA"s Military in Germany :  Comp. f.ex. POTUS GVBush's 1st Visit in Europe on 2005)...

    + And, f.ex., we had to Wait for "the Virus' Crisis, in order for the ill-Treatment of Old People in the EPADs to be Revealed", Deplored further Marine, before Announcng a series of Financial and Organisational Measures, (on a Scandalous Issue, (including abnormal Deaths, Refusals to Admit in Hospitals, Abuse as Guinea Pigs;, in order to Test Fake "Vaccines", etc), tiinitialy Revealed by nearby German Press and CoE's Human Rights' Commissioner, (in France, Sweden, etc, since 2020).

    - "But, France could Help Aged People to Live in Their own Home, as Many Wish', suggested Macron, during that same Debate.

    => It looks like a Good Idea... But, isN't it Too Litlle, and Too Late, for Many ?...

___________________

 

EUHorizonSMEtool

Statistics

Visitantes: 57102395

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.