english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Haupt arrow newsitems arrow French Regions Chiefs plan Book on main Cartoons after Teacher Murder by Islamist Coward Terrorist

French Regions Chiefs plan Book on main Cartoons after Teacher Murder by Islamist Coward Terrorist

Geschrieben von ACM
Monday, 19 October 2020

screenshot_20201019_16me_congrs_des_rgions_en_ligne_le_19_octobre_les_rgions_qg_de_la_reconstruction__en_direct__33_400 


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- A Book on the Most Important Cartoons, Religious and Political, published in France, will be prepared by the Presidents of Regions, to be Distributed to all Lyceum Students, after the Cold-Blood, Atrocious Murder of Teacher Samuel Paty, by a Foreign Islamist Terrorist from the Caucasus, Cowardly Targeting Defenseless Civilian People.  

- "The Fact that, Since a Long Time ago, Existent Together Cartoons concerning All Religions, and Political Cartoons, is a Crystal-Clear Proof of the Secular caracter of our Republic", stressed the Chairman of French Regions' Association, Experienced former Minister and MEP, Renaud Muselier, at the Annual Congress of the Organisation, where participated Also the Prime Minister Castex, European Central Bank CEO Lagarde, Senate's President Larcher, EU Affairs Minister Beaune, etc, while "Eurofora" got a Press Invitation for the relevant Video-Conference.

In consequence, the controversial so-called "Moameth Cartoons" of "Charlie Hebdo" Review, whose Journalists were Notoriously Massacrated on January 2015, at the 1st Big Islamist Terrorism Coward Attack against Civilians, that is Currently Judged at a Trial in Paris, with the allegedly Most Important Survivant coming from Turkey, (as Even the probable Provider of Arms, via Belgium, etc), would be normaly Included in that Book for Lyceums, which are of the Competence of Regions.     

Due to be Drafted by "a Team of Historians", and "in Association with the Education Ministry, that School-Book would Situate "the Right to Cartoons in the Context of the Political History of France", in order to "Defend the Values of the Republic, and the Fundamental Right of Each Citizen to live in Peace and Freedom", stressed Muselier.

- In Fact, "Cartoons are a Fundametal Component of the Freedom of Expression", and "the Offense of Blaspheme does Not Exist, since, when it comes to Humour, our Law Protects Exces and Parody", while, also, "the School plays a Fundamental Role as Cement of the Republic", the French Regions' 2020 Congress underlined in an Official Declaration.

 

rof_president_muselier_with_great_east_pres_rotnr__prime_minister_castex___rof_videoconf__eurofora_screenshot_400
 

=> Therefore, "We'll Never let Anyone to Intimidate, in this Fundamental Task", "those who Work Everyday and with Passion, in the Difficult Job to Help Our Children Advance towards the Age of Adults according to the Values of our Republic", and "we aknowledge our Respect", "Proud for the Role they play in the Cohesion of our Nation", Vowed, Unanimously, All the 18 Presidents of French Regions, Uniting Together Top Repesentatives from Various Political Horizons.

Indeed, even if "Law, Justice and Order are more than ever Necessary in order to Fight Relentlessly against Intolerable Drifts towards Falling Apart", nevertheless, "Above all, it's Up to the Consciences to ensure that Obscurantist Deliriums woN't find, no more, any easy pray : That's", precisely, "the Role that the Nation has EnTrusted to Teachers, who animate the School of the Republic", they stressed.

- "But, 5 Years After the "Charlie Hebdo"'s Terrorist Attacks (2015-2020), the Fact that the Author of such a Cowardly and Barbarious Crime isn't Aged but Only 18 Years Old, says a lot about the Road that has to be Crossed"... In Particular, "it shows how Fundamental becomes  the Mission of the School of the Republic, every day Harder, in a World whose Convulsions Blur the Democratic Foundations", they Warned.

=> "Every Day, Relentesly, the School of the Republic instils to our Children the Base of Our Republican Ideal". It "Teaches our Children that the Rule of Law guarantees a Balance between Individuals living in Society, and ensures Civic Peace". But "Also... that the Republic is Secular : The State does Not exert any Religious Power, and Churches don't exert any Political Power. Thus, the Republican School Fights against Fanatisms, against Obscurantism, against Corruption of any form of Religion. It Builds Emancipated Citizens who have to be Able to Judge about Everything in their Free Consciousness". Because the Republican School's Fundamental Role is to Make our Children Free Citizens : Liberty is a Right, But the Schoom Teaches them that this is Also a Duty : ... to Respect the Freedom of Others, ...the Fundamental Liberties, including the Freedom of Thought and Press Freedom", they pointed out.

>>> "Because what was Targetted" by that Horrible Terrorist Murder of a Teacher by a Coward, "is a Double Symbol : Freedom of Expression, from one side, and the School of the Republic, from another".

- That's why "the Vile and Coward Murder of Samuel Paty, Teacher in a College at Yvelines, on Friday, October 16, has Raised a Huge Emotion throughout Our Country", France. And "this Emotion stands at the Hight of the Republican Symbols that have been Hurt" (Comp. Supra), pinpointed the 2020's RoF Congress' Official Declaration from the outset.

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

---------------------------------

 

 

EUHorizonSMEtool

Statistics

Besucher: 48323703

Archive

Login Form





Daten merken

Passwort vergessen?
Noch keinen Account? Account anlegen

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Resultate

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.