english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Pagina principale arrow newsitems arrow FBI versus critical Web Speech, but Zero on mass Killings ?!

FBI versus critical Web Speech, but Zero on mass Killings ?!

Scritto da ACM
Saturday, 17 February 2018

 fbi_eyes_web_speech_but_not_mass_killings_eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/(OPINION+NEWS)/-
Some Barack Hussein Obama's remnants inside FBI made Today a Big Fuss against Web Free Speech, including by inflicting Criminal "Indictments", etc., while alleging that a few Russian-origin People might have Expressed a Preference for New US President Don Trump, (what a "Crime" !), since he had notoriously spoken in favour of trying to make some "Deals" between USA and Russia,


(I.e. instead of aggravating "Cold War" Tensions and/or dangerous bloody Conflicts, as those notoriously fuelled also by Obama's ..."Fuck the EU" Miss Nulland in Ukraine, which Divided and Weakened Europe;  while also Imposing everywhere a Policy for the Controversial and UnPopular "Same Sex Marriage", including Submission of Children to the Power of Homosexuals under Pretext of "Adoption"; and/or an Unprecedented galoping Islamization and Radicalisation extending even to various Deadly Islamist Terrorists as those of ISIL's cowards BeHeaders, Targetting innocent Civilian People, from Syria to Europe until Russia and even USA, etc).


But, at the Same Moment, they had to admit their Responsibility for Not doing Nothing to prevent a recent Mass-Killing with 17 Dead at a School-shooting, even if FBI knew and might have Prevented the Massacre...


And this comes also after the Las Vegas Mass Killing, of October 2017, where another Gunman Killed 58 People and Wounded 851 more, without the FBI not even Finding what might have been the Killer's "Motivation", even 5 Months Later !

 

This was added to a previous FBI tragic Blunder, when, on 2016, it left totaly Free and with a loaded Gun, but without any safeguard, a person who had Warned that some were Pushing him to Kill, and follow ISIS' Islamist Terrorists' propaganda, (as he finaly did, on January 2017, by killing 5 and Wounding 6 People in a Florida Airport).


=> So, for some, just Click at a Computer in order to Express a legitimate Opinion in a Public Debate during Political Elections, at Home or Abroad, would be much More "Criminal" (sic), than Brutal and unprovoked Mass Murders of innocent Civilian People  ?


That's why those "Deep State" Barack Hussein Obama's remnants, Wasted more than a full Year's work of a Large Team, with a lot of Establishment Media's Publicity, "Indictments", etc., in order to Investigate and "Punish" those who dared express a view at the Internet, etc., while, on the contrary, by Comparing the Facts, it looks as if they didn't give a damn in order to protect People from mass Killers, and not even to find their motives after those Mass Killings ! (See Facts cited Supra).

 

 -------------------------


>>> By the way, Really, didn't ANYONE, linked to any Other Country, ever Backed Hillary Clinton (and/or Barack Hussein Obama) during any Election at all ?...


Did those same FBI Agents ever Investigate that, or Not ?

 
 
fbis_mueller_with_obama_400 


----


=> Otherwise, How could even European People seriously Trust those same FBI Agents to eventually "Help" to "Investigate" several Serious Cases in Europe,


- f.ex., in the Past, the Murder of Ukranian Journalist Gongadze in Ukraine, and Now, the Murder of Web-Journalist Daphne Caruana-Galizia in Malta, or a controversial alleged Corruption affair of the Past in Greece, (as various Governments of the Left have just asked in both these last 2 cases) ?

 

 

 

(../..)

 

 

-------------------

EUDigitalMedia

Statistics

Ospiti: 28957183

Archive

Login Form





Ricordami

Hai perso la tua Password?
Non hai ancora un Profilo? Crea Profilo

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0218_400_01

(Opinion).

 In Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs, as the New EU Parliament's President, new EU Commission's President (+ probably EU Council's President, EU Foreign Minister, etc) should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies.

At the heart of the biggest EU Countries, in France and Germany, EU Citizens clearly voted for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe based on Values, declared explicitly incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

This main choice was also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries, such as Austria (cf. promise of a Referendum), Spain (cf. EPP program's reservations vis a vis Enlargment), etc., while EPP Parties won also in Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, etc.

In other Countries, whenever Governing coalitions didn't make these choices or eluded them, continuing to let a Turkish lobby push for its entry into the EU, they paid a high price, and risked to damage Europe, by obliging EU Citizens to massively vote for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to offer a possibility to promise  real change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU :

It's for this obvious reason that British UKIP (IndDem) succeeded now (after many statements against Turkey's EU bid) to become Great Britain's 2nd Party, unexpectedly growing bigger even than the Governing Labour Party, as well as the Liberal party  ! Facts prove that it's not an isolated phenomenon : A similar development occured in the Netherlands, where Geert Wilders "Party for Freedom" (PVV) became also the 2nd biggest in the country, (after EPP), boosting the chances of a politician who had withdrawn in 2004 from an older party "because he didn't agree with their position on Turkey". And in several other EU Member Countries, even previously small parties which now focused on a struggle against Turkey's controversial demand to enter in the EU, won much more or even doubled the number of their MEPs (fex. Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, etc).

On the contrary, whenever Socialist and oher parties were explicitly or implicitly for Turkey's controversial EU bid, they obviously lost Citizens' votes and fell down to an unprecedented low.

In consequence, EU Citizens clearly revealed their main political choices, in one way or another : They voted to change for less Bureaucracy, but more Politics and Values in a Europe really open to EU Citizens, but without Turkey's controversial EU bid.

Recent political developments are obviously different from the old political landscape which existed in the Past of 1999-2004, when Socialists based on Turkish 1% vote governed undisputed not only in Germany, but also in the UK, Greece and elsewhere, France followed old policies decided when it had been divided by "cohabitation", before the 3 "NO" to EU  Referenda since May 2005, before Merkel, before Sarkozy, etc.... before the surprises of 7 June 2009 new EU Elections.

If the current candidates to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, OK.

Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People.

The beginning of crucial, final Decisions are scheduled for the 1st EU Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, in the middle of July, and they could be completed towards the October session, when Lisbon Treaty's fate will have been fixed.


See relevant Facts also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/2009electionsandturkey.html
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/daulelections.html
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/euroelectionresult.html

 ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Risultati

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.