english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow FBI versus critical Web Speech, but Zero on mass Killings ?!

FBI versus critical Web Speech, but Zero on mass Killings ?!

Ecrit par ACM
Saturday, 17 February 2018

 fbi_eyes_web_speech_but_not_mass_killings_eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/(OPINION+NEWS)/-
Some Barack Hussein Obama's remnants inside FBI made Today a Big Fuss against Web Free Speech, including by inflicting Criminal "Indictments", etc., while alleging that a few Russian-origin People might have Expressed a Preference for New US President Don Trump, (what a "Crime" !), since he had notoriously spoken in favour of trying to make some "Deals" between USA and Russia,


(I.e. instead of aggravating "Cold War" Tensions and/or dangerous bloody Conflicts, as those notoriously fuelled also by Obama's ..."Fuck the EU" Miss Nulland in Ukraine, which Divided and Weakened Europe;  while also Imposing everywhere a Policy for the Controversial and UnPopular "Same Sex Marriage", including Submission of Children to the Power of Homosexuals under Pretext of "Adoption"; and/or an Unprecedented galoping Islamization and Radicalisation extending even to various Deadly Islamist Terrorists as those of ISIL's cowards BeHeaders, Targetting innocent Civilian People, from Syria to Europe until Russia and even USA, etc).


But, at the Same Moment, they had to admit their Responsibility for Not doing Nothing to prevent a recent Mass-Killing with 17 Dead at a School-shooting, even if FBI knew and might have Prevented the Massacre...


And this comes also after the Las Vegas Mass Killing, of October 2017, where another Gunman Killed 58 People and Wounded 851 more, without the FBI not even Finding what might have been the Killer's "Motivation", even 5 Months Later !

 

This was added to a previous FBI tragic Blunder, when, on 2016, it left totaly Free and with a loaded Gun, but without any safeguard, a person who had Warned that some were Pushing him to Kill, and follow ISIS' Islamist Terrorists' propaganda, (as he finaly did, on January 2017, by killing 5 and Wounding 6 People in a Florida Airport).


=> So, for some, just Click at a Computer in order to Express a legitimate Opinion in a Public Debate during Political Elections, at Home or Abroad, would be much More "Criminal" (sic), than Brutal and unprovoked Mass Murders of innocent Civilian People  ?


That's why those "Deep State" Barack Hussein Obama's remnants, Wasted more than a full Year's work of a Large Team, with a lot of Establishment Media's Publicity, "Indictments", etc., in order to Investigate and "Punish" those who dared express a view at the Internet, etc., while, on the contrary, by Comparing the Facts, it looks as if they didn't give a damn in order to protect People from mass Killers, and not even to find their motives after those Mass Killings ! (See Facts cited Supra).

 

 -------------------------


>>> By the way, Really, didn't ANYONE, linked to any Other Country, ever Backed Hillary Clinton (and/or Barack Hussein Obama) during any Election at all ?...


Did those same FBI Agents ever Investigate that, or Not ?

 
 
fbis_mueller_with_obama_400 


----


=> Otherwise, How could even European People seriously Trust those same FBI Agents to eventually "Help" to "Investigate" several Serious Cases in Europe,


- f.ex., in the Past, the Murder of Ukranian Journalist Gongadze in Ukraine, and Now, the Murder of Web-Journalist Daphne Caruana-Galizia in Malta, or a controversial alleged Corruption affair of the Past in Greece, (as various Governments of the Left have just asked in both these last 2 cases) ?

 

 

 

(../..)

 

 

-------------------

EUHorizonSMEtool

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 30122832

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.