english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Strasbourg's ECHR case-law on Refugees topped Brussels EU Summit after Czech claims on Lisbon Treaty

Strasbourg's ECHR case-law on Refugees topped Brussels EU Summit after Czech claims on Lisbon Treaty

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 28 October 2009

 

costaklaus

    Strasbourg's ECHR's case-law on Refugees and displaced persons unexpectedly topped the European Agenda, from the current Cyprus' talks up to ..Brussels' EU Summit, as decisions on EU's top jobs were suspended on finding a solution to Czech President Klaus' claim for exceptions to the European Human Rights' principles on victims' right to return, restitution or compensation of usurpated homes and private properties, afraid that they might be applied to German-culture populations expulsed at the aftermath of the 2nd World War..

A surprise visit of ECHR's President, Jean-Paul Costa, to the Czech Republic, a few days ago, coincided with Klaus' anouncement welcoming a Swedish EU Presidency's proposal and accepting to "start working" on it, the same day that Costa, after meeting him in Prague, was visiting also the Czech Constitutional Court, (where a complaint against Lisbon Treaty is pending), at Brno on October 23, 2009.

Adding to a surprising series of converging "coincidences", the move was made the same day that, after denouncing earlier strong disagreements with Turkey on Refugees' Human Rights, now Cyprus' Media reported an agreement between Cyprus' President Christofias and Turkish Cypriot leader Talat for a "Formula" on Refugees' homes and properties with "exceptions" and special "categories" for plots of land where, meanwhile, the Turkish Occupation regime may have built "roads, public utility buildings,.. or houses and collective buildings". Something which was exceptionally hailed by T/C leader Talat as "a very good development, because with that method we overcame the deadlock on (Refugees') properties".

phileleftheros_23_oct._09_formule_for_refugees_homes__properties_400

    But, meanwhile, ECHR reminded both to Klaus and Turkey the "Loizidou" and "Cyprus v. Turkey" case-law against "Continuing"" violations of Greek Cypriot Refugees' Family life and Property Rights by condemning Ankara at another landmark case (Olymbiou)  this week.

    And Christofias reportedly said that he'd ask at EU Summit assurances that any concession to Klaus for 2ndWW issues should not affect the differend situation which still exists in Cyprus since the 1974 Turkish Military invasion, nor ECHR's case-law on Greek Cypriot Refugees, elaborated between 1996 and 2001.

- "I don't know why this visit (to Klaus and to the Czech Constitutional Court) was made now, nor what was said by President Costa", simply declined to answer ECHR's experienced Head of Communication, Rodrick Liddell, to "EuroFora"'s questions, without, however, denying that it might have been related with on-going attempts to convince Czechs to ratify the Lisbon Treaty speaking

    Liddell was asked by "EuroFora" why Klaus claimed that he was afraid of Lisbon Treaty's "Human Rights' Charter", if a similar result on displaced persons' properties might be eventually obtained also through the exisiting ECHR's mecanism, that the Czech Republic has already ratified

    - It's true that "ECHR already has competence to consider complaints lodged against the Czech Republic",  However, "in principle it couldn't go as far as to cover 2nd World War cases" (dating from 1945), But "I don't know" "if it might be considered a continuous" violation of Displaced persons' rights, as in Cyprus' cases (dating from 1974), the ECHR Official carefully replied..

    -  "As you know yourself, the events which are at the origin of a case must occur after the ratification of the ECHR. That's the principle. But, there are, as you know, situations where the link between the events and the complaint is considered to be sufficient", he reminded.

    Smiling at "EuroFora""s question on the astonishing "coincidence" that Klaus "positive" statement for a possible deal with the EU on his claim on German Displaced persons came "the same day" that ECHR's President Costa visited him, the ECHR's Senior Official, simply replied that he had "no information on whether the President's visit might have contributed to influence that", and promissed "to ask him about that", without denying.

    Meanwhile, Karel Jungwiert, the judge elected at the ECHR in respect of the Czech Republic, who had accompagnied President Costa in his visit to Prague and Brno, was still out of Strasbourg exceptionally "until next week", apparently following constantly and consulted on the on-going dealings on Displaced persons' Rights between the Swedish EU Presidency and Czech President Klaus in the run up to Brussels' EU Summit this week-end, as well as to the preparation of Czech Constitutional Court's verdict, due to be published at Brno early next week, "EuroFora" learned from other ECHR Officials.

    ECHR's President Costa was "aware" of the recent moves by Czech President Klaus' and a group of Senators to oppose Lisbon Treaty by refusing ratification as long as the 2nd WW's issue of German culture displaced People's properties wasn't definitively settled, and by lodging a collective complaint to the Czech Constitutional Court, respectively, and all that "had initially incited him to consider postponing his visit", another ECHR Official said to "EuroFora". 

 But she wasn't in a position to explain what made Costa, finally, change stance and decide to visit the Czech Republic, its President Klaus, and its Constitutional Court, at Prague and Brno the 22 and 23 of October, nor what was really said the day Lisbon Treaty's ratification was apparently unblocked...     

All these converging but unusual Facts inevitably provoked on-going Speculations in Strasbourg on how ECHR's President Costa might have helped to convince Czech President Klaus to start moving on Lisbon Treaty, despite his proclaimed fear that 2nd WW German culture people might ask ECHR to extend "Loizidou" and "Cyprus v. Turkey" case-law, initially concerning "continuing" violations of Greek Cypriot Refugees' Homes and properties     

Logically, this could be done either by ... giving up to Klaus' demand, i.e. by restricting (in one way or another) the practical functioning and the impact of ECHR's case-law, by imposing, fex. more strict temporary and/or restitution limits, etc., or, on the contrary, by reminding him that ECHR already existed, independently of Lisbon Treaty. and Human Rights could not be modified for political expediences.

echrlisbon_treaty_400

    But the first option woud be obviously percieved as a serious setback on Human Rights' protection for Political expediencies , which could also provoke a dangerous precedent for other claims, by other States too in future..     

On the contrary, mainstream French Newspaper "Figaro" strongly criticized, in this regard, the Czech measures of 1945, known as "Benes' regulations", "forgotten in comparison to the Shoa" by the NAZI, about "the eviction of Sudetes  : .A measure of "Ethnic Cleansing", which "confiscated the properties and expulsed more than 2,5 million Germans, Men, Women and Children", in revenge of Hitler's acts in the name of a controversial "collective responsibility".
     - But, "nobody didn't ever recognize the Benes' regulations, since 1945, neither in the West, nor in the European Union", the mainstream French Newspaper stressed, criticizing Klaus for "asking now the EU to indirectly legitimize the "infernal" Benes' regulations about past "Ethnic Cleansings"..

    However, Klaus' move seems "absurd" since Lisbon Treaty's "Fundamental Rights' Charter" "cannot be applied, at any case, on what happened back in 1945", "Figaro" said.

    Thus, another possibility is that, perhaps, on the contrary, Costa contributed to convince Klaus by simply reminding him that ECHR already existed and might eventually consider applications also by German-culture people expulsed from the Czech Republic after the 2nd WW (if certain conditions were fullfilled) asking to get back their properties, independently of the Lisbon Treaty and its "Fundamental Rights"' Charter.

    This would obviously be more in line with Human Rights' general principles, regardless of whether ECHR might accept or reject such applications as inadmissible, or unfounded.

    ECHR's Judgement condemning Turkey on Greek Cypriot Refugee Olymbiou's case for violating her Family life and Property Rights (Articles 8, and 1 Protocol 1 ECHR), by confirming the "Loizidou" and "Cyprus v. Turkey" case-law, denouncing a "Continuous Denial of Access", and a "Continuing and Total Denial of Access to their Property (as) a clear interference with the Right of the Displaced Greek Cypriots to the peaceful enjoyment of (their) posessions" (respectively), topically reminded both to Ankara and Klaus the European Human Rights' principles.

    - "But no case ever declared admissible by the European Court on the evictions of that period" of 2nd World War from the Czech Republic, "Figaro" also noted.

    Is this, perhaps, Klaus' real demand also for the present and the future ?  In that case, could such a demand be acceptable by Europe, without endangering the entire European mecanism for the protection of Human Rights ?

    For Cyprus, the only "advantage" from Klaus' manoeuvers could be that Nicosia might take on its side, at least symbolically, Berlin, (and in extension, Germany's closest partner : France), vis a vis Turkey's partitionist claims against Refugees' human rights.

    But it's also true, that Lisbon Treaty provides for EU's accession to the ECHR, expected to submit, for the 1st time, all acts of EU institutions themselves to the control of Strasbourg's Court on complaints for Human Rights violations.

However, many had said earlier that, regardless of what anyone might think of him, Klaus' critical view on the EU might be useful at least in order to help EU Citizens fight against Bureaucracy. This leaves it an even deeper Mystery to know what or who convinced him to change orientation and focus, on the contrary, on restricting Citizens' Human Rights...

***

EuroStars-Eureka

Statistics

Visitors: 60327542

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0634_400

People in Europe and the World expect from CoE to make a succes of its "Monitoring" for Human Rights and Democracy, despite difficulties, said Finland's President Tarja Halonen to "EuroFora" at a crucial moment for the mecanism built 15 years ago by the paneuropean organization which celebrates its 60th Anniversary in 2009.

Halonen, known as "Mother" of CoE's "Monitoring" mecanism, a long-time MEP and former Foreign Minister before becoming Finland's President, holds a long experience in the mattter, after also serving twice as CoE and EU Chairwoman in the past. That's why she is well placed to judge how CoE's "monitoring" should deal today with some crucial issues of importance both to CoE and to the EU.

The move came just a Month before a crucial, last visit to Turkey, scheduled for June, by the President of CoE''s "Monitoring" Committee, Ukranian MEP Serge Holovaty, to finalize his Report on Ankara, the CoE Member State with the longest Monitoring procedure. From its results depends its overall credibility.

This is a Test-case, because, in fact, it's in order to avoid Sanctions threatened against Turkey by a CoE's Assembly's April 1995 Resolution for grave Human Rights violations, Democracy gaps, the continuing Military Occupation in Cyprus, the unresolved Kurdish problem, Aegean differend with Greece, etc., that MEPs decided to create, for the 1st time on April 1996, a "Monitoring" proces, allegedly destinated to check, without excluding Countries who did not fulfill all CoE's standards.

In the Past, the obliged withdrawal of Greece's Military regime and of its "Civil" cover-up out of the CoE had helped bring back Democracy in 1974. But, on the contrary, since April 1996, the idea was to "monitor" Human Rights' respect while keeping most concerned Countries inside the CoE. After Turkey's oldest example, this was extended also to several former "Eastern" European Countries, even if CoE's Assembly has imposed to some of them (fex. Ukraine, Russia, etc., after Belarus, Serbia, etc) various "Sanctions", that Ankara always avoided. Curiously more succesful even than .. USA itself, (a CoE "Observer" since 1995), which has been at least threatened with sanctions some years ago..

EU-effects of CoE's Monitoring process became obvious between 2001-2008, since the "closure" of this procedure, when CoE felt that a Country had met most of its Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law obligations, (i.e. the "Copenhagen Criteria" for the EU), helped trigger Negotiations with the EU for "Accession" or other closer relations : This occured already before the 2004 and 2007 EU Enlargements to former "Eastern" European Countries, as well as for the commencement of "accession" negotiations with Croatia, and of "open-ended" negotiations with Turkey in 2005.

    But a stricking new development are Holovaty's recent findings that on core Human Rights issues as Torture and Freedom of Expression, Turkey, even "5 Years after" CoE closed its "Monitoring", back in 2004, inciting EU to start accession Negotiations in 2005, still presents grave problems.

    His findings are of crucial importance after a 2008 CoE Resolution called, "if need be", to "seriously consider the possibility of Re-Opening the Monitoring procedure for Turkey" : A move which might affect Ankara's controversial EU bid, since EU Accession Negotiations are based on the Hypothesis that the Candidate fullfils the "Copenhagen Criteria" (See above)..
-------------------------
    Holovaty expressed his will to check  "Matters still Outstanding" and  those that he "didn't have an opportunity to discuss" at an earlier visit this year, "in order to discuss the more complex issues in greater depth", at his forthcoming New Visit to Ankara, before the December 2009 EU Summit.  This is all based on the 2004 CoE Resolution which stresses that, CoE "will continue.. post-monitoring Dialogue with the Turkish authorities,...in addition to a 12-points list,..and on any Other Matter that might arise in connection with Turkey’s Obligations as a CoE member state".

    CoE's Resolution also asks  from Turkey "to secure the proper Implementation of Judgements, particularly in the Cyprus v. Turkey InterState case", of 2001, which concerns also the plight of many Hundreds of MISSING People. It adds Turkey's obligations to "execute" ECHR's Judgements in the Loizidou case,..and in particular adopt General Measures to avoid repetition or continuation of Violations found by the Court" to the detriment of Refugees.

    Nevertheless, Holovaty said to "EuroFora" that "MISSING" persons,"might be included" and cannot be excluded, but he has yet to examine the situation "to find out  which issues will be raised" to the Turkish Government.

    Therefore, "EuroFora" asked Halonen, as the Historic "Mother" of CoE's Monitoring mecanism, if she thought that, "whenever there are grave Human Rights Violations, as fex. "MISSING" persons, attested even by ECHR's judgements, they should be always checked by a Monitoring process. Or could they be forgotten ?"
    
     - "We (CoE) must be, at the same time, Fair, Realistic, but not in the mind that "now we have Forgotten", etc., replied to "EuroFora"'s question Halonen, speaking as a matter of general principle.

    - "When we think of those People that are suffering from the lack of Democracy, of Human Rights, and of the Rule of Law", "we should find a base on how to deal with the (Monitoring) system more rapidly"', she stressed.

    - "Sometimes it's very difficult to combine Transparency and Effectivenes together, particularly in this specific case", she went on to say. But, "I have not found a (CoE Member) Country who could be insensitive in this sens", Halonen answered concerning grave Human Rights violations attested by the ECHR.

    - "I have no ready-made answer. I have the expectations that you, in the CoE, will, step by step, find the different types of the monitoring systems."

    Also "because this is a part of the UN's Post-Conflict system, (fex. when it comes to Cyprus' MISSING persons), and it's a more Global system". So that, "If we make a succes in Europe, the others will follow", throughout the World.  "But they expect that we (Europe) are this opportunity, this Opportunity to make a Succes", Halonen concluded.

    In addition, she advised to extend CoE's Monitoring to all its 47 Member States, "because, as long as we hear that, all these monitoring systems are "OK for the neighbor, but not for me", "it's very difficult" to understand. Something which could make easier to Compare...

    Finnish MEP Jaako Laakso, former CoE Rapporteur on the Occupied Territories of Cyprus and one of the 5 Signatories of the Historic CoE's call to create the "MONITORING" mecanism since 1996, was more specific :  - "We (CoE Assembly) have to find a way for the issue of Cyprus' MISSING People to be better followed", he stressed, anouncing his intention to "speak to Mr. Holovaty" about that. "There might be also other ways", added Laakso.

    - The 2008 "Year had been a very Bad one for Turkey with regard to Human Rights in general, and Freedom of Expression in particular", denounced, meanwhile, Holovaty's preliminary Post-Monitoringh Draft Report by Holovaty, published by the CoE on April 2009.

    "Amnesty International believes that freedom of expression is not guaranteed given the various articles of the Criminal Code that restrict it. .. "For example, 1,300 Websites are said to have been closed down by the (Turkish) authorities in 2008" ! While "the new Turkish Criminal Code was used to bring a total of 1,072 proceedings between June 2005 and April 2008, and led to the conviction of 192 people", for expressing views. "Representatives of the Özgür Gündem newspaper, which specialises in Kurdish affairs, ..complained about Numerous Attacks on their Freedom of Expression ...as was everyone who advocated a settlement to the question by means other than the intervention of the army" "According to their figures, 19 Newspapers had been suspended 43 times between 4 August 2006 and 4 November 2008" !...

    Moreover, on 2008,  CoE's "Ministers adopted its 4rth Resolution on the execution of the judgments of the ECHR, ...and outstanding issues regarding 175 Judgements and decisions relating to Turkey delivered between 1996 and 2008...  concerning Deaths resulting from the excessive use of force by members of the Security forces, the failure to protect the right to life, the DIisappearance and/or death of individuals, Ill-Treatment and the Destruction of property". CoE's " Ministers urged the Turkish authorities ...to ensure that members of Security forces of all ranks can be prosecuted without administrative
authorisation" for "serious crimes". Holovaty reminded.

"Nonetheless", Holovaty heard anew of "Several cases of Violence committed last year (2008) by the (Turkish) security forces". Amnesty International speaks of Many Cases of ill-treatment and Torture in the prisons and by the police". "Including, fex."'the death of Engin Ceber, a young man of 29 who died on October 2008 as a result of the TORTURE allegedly inflicted on him by police officers, prison staff and members of the gendarmerie. He was part of a group of people arrested on September 2008 during a demonstration and Press Conference in Istanbul'. Proceedings against suspects are "on-going" in this case.

- " I therefore noted an Obvious Contradiction between the Government’s stated “zero tolerance” policy.... of Torture and other forms of ill-treatment, and the different testimonies given", denounced CoE's Rapporteur.  Turkish "authorities must make considerable efforts to guarantee that proper investigations are carried out into allegations of abuses by members of the security forces and that perpetrators are effectively punished" "In this respect, I have requested detailed Statistics on the number of Investigations, acquittals and convictions in cases involving allegations of abuse in order to show the positive impact of the measures taken to date", Holovaty said, repeating a permanently unsatisfied CoE's demand to Turkey since a Decade...

    - "The Political Crisis that shook the country in the spring of 2008 highlighted the Weaknesses of the (Turkish) Constitution", which comes from the Military regime of 1982, "and the Urgent Need of Reforms", stressed from the outset CoE's Rapporteur in 2009. In particular, "the ...Democratic functioning of state institutions, including the independence of the judicial system, are crucial", he observes.

    But, "the Electoral  system and the ways in which it is circumvented do not appear to give those elected complete Legitimacy, and tend to pervert the course of direct universal suffrage", denounces Holovaty, observing that, even 5 Years later, Turkey did not yet change the 10% nationwide Threshold for a party to take any seat, which is "far higher" than the "3%" maximum in Europe and already condemned as contrary to European Standards by the CoE.

    + Moreover, EU Parliament's 2009 Report on Turkey, drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and adopted in Strasbourg on March, expresses "Concern over the Failure of the (Turkish) Judiciary to prosecute cases of Torture and Ill-treatment, the Number of which is Growing". EU also "is concerned about continuing Hostility and Violence against Minorities" in Turkey. It also "calls on the Turkish Government to launch, as a matter of Priority, a Political Initiatve favouring a lasting Settlement of the Kurdish issue, (while "condemning violence.. and terrorist groups"). EU "regrets that No progress has been made on establishing full, systematic Civilian suprevisory functions over the (Turkish) Military".

    The final results of Holovaty's 2nd and last visit to Turkley will be known later this year, and, at any case, before EU's December 2009 Summit.

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING