english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow EU Parliament Rapporteur Costello to EuroFora on EU and USA Food+rehabilitation Aid for Poor People

EU Parliament Rapporteur Costello to EuroFora on EU and USA Food+rehabilitation Aid for Poor People

Parašė ACM
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
eu_rapporteur_to_agg_400

*EU Parliament/Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- EU Parliament's Rapporteur on the European Aid to the most Deprived People, Irish MEP Emer Costello (ESD), from the Governing coalition currently chairing EU Council, replying to "EuroFora"s Questions, pointed at the fact that the American Federal Government continues to spend some 100 Billions € for Food stamps to the Poor, i.e. apparently much more than the EU, but welcomed also EU's intention to reportedly add Social Re-Integration measures, due to help People get out of Poverty traps, while admitting, however, the fact that several other MEPs and NGOs warn to find adequate ways to prevent any risk of "substitution" of urgently needed, elementary Food Aid, by Employment-related matters, whch are difficult to apply f.ex. to Children, very Old People, irregulatrs, etc, so that a balanced Compromise is yet to be soon decided between MEPs, Commission and Governments (See Infra).

20130521_150350_400

The move came at a Press Conference just after EU Parliament's Employmenyt and Social affairs Committee adopted with a Majority her Report on the creation of an EU "Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived" People, yesterday (Monday) Evening.


pe_evening_monday_20_may_2013_400



- "EuroFora" had asked Costello, (who is also President of the EU - Palestinian Legislative Council delegation), what was the relevant situation in other developed Western Countries, as, f.ex. in the USA, compared to Europe.

pe_rapporteur_looking_top_agg_400 

+ As well as for some "more concrete" information on EU's reported intention "not only to help in situations of Extreme Poverty, but also into contributing to get Out of Poverty", as she had highlighted earlier.

agg_quest_pe_b_also_remedy_400 

----------------------------

- "You made a reference to the U.S., and, indeed, the U.S. Department of Agriculture spends approximatively a 100 Billions € to help eligible Households in terms of Food Aid" :


- "That's 100 Billions € that they (USA) would spend, and that Funding Stream (still) comes from the Agrcultural Department", (i.e. at a Federal level), EU Parliament's Rapporteur stressed in reply  to "EuroFora"s 1st question.

pe_rap_repoly_sml_to_agg_400

Naturally, to be fair and accurate, EU Countries'  Help to extremely deprived People at a National level  should also be taken into account in any estimations which would compare the overall Help to extremely Poor People in Europe with that which exists in the U.S., (where, sometimes, also Federated States add to the U.S. Federal Aid, too).
-----------------


+ "On your 2nd Question : One of the main Differencies between this particular proposal, (for the period of 2014-2020) and the previous one (which existed between 2007-2013), is that the previous one came from the (EU) Agricultural Budget line, while, this particular Fund will come now from the Cohesion funds, i.e. it will come from the Social Budget", Costello went on in her replies to "EuroFora".


 - "That's something very Important, because one of the issues around the New (EU) Fund is that it has Requirements from the Organizations which are working with the Administraton to find the beneficiaries of this Fund, to actually Engage in what's called "Accompagnying Measures" : That's essentially to contribute into finding ways to Help re-Integrate these People into Society". F.ex., "If they are Homeless, that the(se) Organizations should help them find a Home ; if they are Unemployed, that they help to bring them into a stage where they might participate in a Training course, that is actually funded by the ESF" (EU's Social Fund),etc., she indicated.

=> - "This (New) particular (EU) Program, because it has a Social Inclusion emphasis, differs from the previous program, and we believe that it's something which is actually very important. That's an area where the NGOs,the Charities are actually Welcomed", as it was stressed "when we (EU Parliament) went at Consultation with them", she concluded on this point.

pe_reply_tpo_agg__400
 

+ At any case, "it's important to know that this is the ONLY (EU) instrument that deals with People suffering from an Extreme level of Poverty, because the ESF funding is normaly for Labor Market interventions", i.e. "it's adressing issues of may be Disadvantaged or Unemployment, rather than Extreme material Deprivaton", EU Parliament's Rapporteur clearly Distinguished.  
------------


Meanwhile, it seems true, (as a collegue Journalist evoked immediately afterwards), that some mainstream NGOs warned against what they called "a Substitution effect", particularly "if the programme allows the financing of Social services", because they are afraid that at least some "EU member States will be tempted to finance their own Structural costs, instead of Food hungry people". In this regard, they reportedly "stressed that the program is about the fundamental Right to Food", while, Today, "some 18 Million EU citizens desperately need this", "many of whom are Not even Employable (f.ex. Children, Elderly, Irregular migrants, etc.)". But, "Food Aid is a Bridge to Social and Employment services", which should, normally, keep their own resources.


That's one of the reasons for which the proposal, in its current shape, even if it got a clear Majority in the competent EU Parliament's Employment and Social affairs Committee, nevertheless, it lacked 2 more votes in order to become able to start immediately final Negotiations with EU Commission and EU Member  States' Governments at EU Council, so that it will need to be better hammered out inside EU Parliament (probably in concertation with the competent EU Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, László Andor), before final decisions in the forthcoming Months, (and while the wider framework of EU's Multi-Annual Financial Perspectives 2014-2020 is still negotiated between MEPs, Commission and Governments, hopefully arriving at conclusions during or after the Summer, as some unverified yet but generally well informed sources indicated later to "EuroFora").

(../..)

***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent, earlier, to "EuroFora"s Subsribers/Donors. A more accurate, full Final Version might be published asap).

***

 

EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Lankytojai: 57072502

Archive

Login Form





Prisiminti mane

Pamiršote slaptažodį?
Nesate prisiregistravęs? Prisiregistruoti

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 bisky_center_400
 

Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.

For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :  

- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.

imag0025_400_01

- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties",  he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
 
At any case,  "we  (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.

- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"           

- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
                                                                                                                                                                        
- "EuroLeft  and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"

- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."

- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.

imag0935_400

Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :

- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.

But, many Facts indicate the contrary :

Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).

During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side :  Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.

The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).

Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.

"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.  

So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.

To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...

Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of  representative Democracy a topical meaning :

 - "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.

Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".

- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.

***





-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultatai

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.