

ECHR Raises Critical Questions v. Compulsory Controversial Vaccines against Human Rights in France+

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- With an Important Series of Moves, which may Affect, Directly several European States, (but Also, indirectly, USA and Other Countries in the World, holding a Special Status at the CoE), the Strasbourg-Based PanEuropean Court of Human Rights (ECHR), strong of 47 Member States (including Russia), for the 1st Time, Raised Critical Questions versus making Compulsory a Few Controversial Vaccines, (while Many Others, Already at the 3rd, Final Stage of Tests, are Still Not Authorized in the EU : See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/majorityvaccinesclassicbutnotyeteu.html, etc), against Human Rights, particularly in France, Expecting a full Reply well Before the Crucial, forthcoming Presidential and Parliamentary Elections of April and June 2022, respectively.
ECHR's relevant Moves Follow a Critical Warning by CoE's Secretary General, Marija Buric-Pejcinovic, (former Vice-Prime Minister in Croatia), Published as Early as, Already Since March 2021, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coewarnsoneuvaccinationpassports.html), and a Damning Resolution by CoE's Parliamentary Assembly, Later this Year (on June 2021 : See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coeslamsviruspassrisks.html, etc), After a Critical Report by CoE's Committee on BioEthics, as well as Several concrete Points Raised, meanwhile, by the French Higher Administrative Court ("Conseil d'Etat"), in the Meantime, and Refers, in Addition, to Similar (but Not Identical) Legal Complaints recently Lodged against equivalent Controversial Measures taken in Greece, (even if in Partly Different Circumstances and/or Official Motivations). ECHR stands at the Core of the CoE, the PanEuropean Organisation for Democracy, Rule of Law and Human Rights, which hosts Also the International Treaty on "BioEthics" (alias Human Rights and Medicine or Biology), the Only Legaly Binding Convention, Open for signature by Any Country in the World, in that Topical Area, known as "Treaty of Oviedo" (since 1998). ECHR's Presidency had Recently expressed, on 2020, its Readiness into Interpreting such BioEthical Legal Principles and Rules, (See, f.ex.: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coesgburiconechrbioethicsinterpretation.html, etc).
---------------------------
The Main Case of Today concerns a Legal Complaint lodged by a French Fire-Fighter, Pierrick Thevenon, aged 33, against a Law of August 5, 2021, which Imposes, to some Categories of Workers, a Compulsory Full Vaccination, with one of 4 Vaccines Authorized in the EU, (Comp. Supra + Infra), Otherwise being Suspended from their
This is, Currently, the Only such Application Pending on that "Hot", Topical Issue, as some Other, Similar but Not Identical Cases, in France and Greece, have been Rejected, for Procedural Reasons, related to their own Claims. + But 712 Other Persons have Already Declared their Intention to Lodge an Identical Application to the ECHR, as Thevenon did, on this Same Issue asap, the EuroJudges observed.
The 4 Questions Raised by the Court's 5th Section, Chaired by ECHR VicePresident Miss Siofra O'Leary from Ireland, Professor at Cambridge University, and Vice-Chair Mārtiņš Mits, University Professor from Lund, Sweden, include, in particular, whether the Suspension sine die of his Salary, after Refusal to get Vaccinated by certain Jabs, was "a Breach of his Right to the Enjoyment of his Posessions" (Article 1 of the 1st Protocol to the ECoHR, which Protects mainly Private Property), and/or if he faced a "Discrimination, based on his Occupation", because, "Unlike Other Workers", he was "Obliged" to Obey to that as Order, (in Violation of Articles 14 and 8 of the ECoHR). In addition, ECHR Also asked whether such a "Compulsory Vaccination" with certain Jabs was "a Breach of his Right to Respect for his Private Life", (but also if he had "Exhausted Domestic Remedies" in France, as a purely Procedural Requirement).
The competent French Authorities were given by the ECHR a Time Deadline for Reply until January 27, 2022, i.e. Well Before the above-mentioned Presidential and Parliamentary Elections, but in the Middle of the relevant Socio-Political Debates, (Comp. Supra).
In ECHR's Long History and relevant Case-Law, the Violation of Private Property clause (Comp. Supra), has Notoriously been Used by EuroJudges also in order to Sanction some Very Grave Violations of Human Rights, such as, f.ex., the still Persisting Deprivation of Greek-Cypriot Refugees/Displaced Persons' access to their Family Homes, Belongings, and Ancestral Land, by the Turkish Military Invasion and Occupation of the Island's Northern Territories since 1974 : - "That's what we really Wanted to Condemn, But the Tragedy is that most EuroJudges prefered to put it under the <<Private Property>> clause", had characteristicaly Told "Eurofora"'s Co-Founder Refugee Miss Tina Loizidou, Already since 1994, when she was the 1st to Win such a Landmark and World-Famous case...
Even if this 1st Individual Application by Mr. Thevenon might, Eventually, be Rejected Later-on for Purely Procedural Claims, (as, f.ex., the "Non Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies", i.e. if he DidN't yet Find the Time to Previously Address himself to All the Competent French Courts, as All Applicants routinely have to do Before comming to Strasbourg), then, Obviously, Nothing Hinders Both Himself, Afterwards, and/or Any of those Other 712 Victims of the Same Problems, who have Already Declared their Intention to Lodge asap. a Similar Application to the ECHR, as EuroJudges noted (Comp. Supra), to eventualy Repeat All or Part of those Same Other 3 Key Points, mentioned in Today's ECHR's Decision.
+ Moreover, Earlier, (as ECHR's Services Reminded Today), a somewhat Similar, But Not Identical, Collective Application Lodged by Greek People, (30 Health Workers, Private Doctors or Public Hospital staff), had Also Raised Many Other, Interesting Legal Points, including Also, f.ex., alleged Violations of the Human Right to Life, Inhuman/Degrading Treatment, Forced Labour or Slavery, Liberty and Security, Fair Hearing, etc.., referring to Articles 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. (Even if their 1st such Move had been Droped, on September 2021, for Various Points Specific to the Particular Way that They had Presented that Initial, concrete Application, then).
On "Liberty", a Fundamental Principle of CoE's landmark Convention on BioEthics is the Need of a well "Informed Consent" to Any eventual Intervention on Human Health : A Rule Notoriously steming from the Nuremberg Trial against Nazism's notorious InHuman Methods in Concentration Camps, where Detainees were abused as "Cobays" submited to various "Tests", (as those Abused Previously by the Ottoman Turkish Empire against Armenians)...
Concerning at least the Life/Inhuman-Degrading Treatment/Security relevant Issues, Nowadays, After a Notorious Discreditation of "Astrazeneca"'s Jab, Following several Deaths and Many Suspensions in Various Countries accrosss the World, it's Yesterday Also "Johnson Johnson"'s "Jennsen" Jab which was Suspended in current EU President Slovenia, after a Death, and even the Controversial "m-RNA" Novel Tool used by "Moderna" and "BioNTech/Pfizer", which was Suspended Today in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland, (on the Occasion of "Moderna"), after Several Tragic Incidents, particularly on Heart Inflamations, Even of Young and Healthy People.
Meanwhile, a North American Judge reportedly Suspended a similar Mandatory Vaccination as "BioNTech/Pfizer"/"Moderna", etc., on certain Workers, as in Europe, for Questions of Violation of Christian Religious Beliefs, because of Human Parts from Aborted Embryos allegedly used in such Controversial Jab, (an Issue that has Not Yet been Raised at the ECHR). In Addition, Something Fishy Seems to exist around the Precise Numbers of Deaths due to Side-Effects of suh m-RNA "Fake Vaccines" as those of "BioNTech/Pfizer", given the Fact that some Mainstream Medias cite about "5" Cases throughout all Europe, (plus anOther in New Zeland), while Others, later, cite "6" Cases Only in France. ! But Official Sources are Also cited for alleged ..."386" (sic !)Deaths Questioned after taking a "Pfizer/BioNTech" "Vaccine", Only in France, Just at the Beginning of 2021... However, Astonishingly, ..."Only 1" among them was reportedly Examined as, perhaps, due to those Controversial "Fake Vaccines" ! + Similar Inconsistencies also in USA's relevant Data : Some mainstream Medias (at close periods of Time) point at "Hundreds" of Deaths after taking such "m-RNA" so-called Vaccines, while Others speak of ...several "Thousands" ! Obviously, much More Clarity and Serious Criteria are Needed, in order to Ensure that there is Not any Hidden Blunder or Massacre there...
*Already from the Beginning, Top Medical (pro-vaccine) Doctors in France had been reportedly Surprized, since 2020, according to Mainstream Press, by an Exceptionaly Long List of Side Effects in this case, to the point that they had Initialy Advised to Better leave such "Vaccines", at least for the Time being, withOut Using them, in order to "Wait", rather, for some "Better Vaccines" than that, (with the Unique Exception of those Too "Fragile" People who Could Not take the Slightest Risk to Wait, Not Even a bit)...*But Others had Even gone Further, f.ex. Warning that Such kind of "m-RNA" Novel Tools Risked, inter alia, Particularly Also to, Sooner or Later, in one way or another, Reveal some Serious Problems against Human Health, concerning mainly "Hemorragies" and/or "Inflamations", with Dangers around "Thrombosis" and/or Heart Issues, as "MyoCardite", "PeriCardite", etc. Indeed, such kind of Dangerous Issues, (including, particularly, Even Young People, apparently in Good Health), seem to have been Multiplying, Recently, Even to the Point to Raise Life or Death matters, (as Recent Facts have just Shown : Com. Supra).
+ However, the Worse, may Still Remain to be Discovered Later-on : Indeed, in Addition to some Possible Syndroms of Facial or Arms' Muscles' Immobilisations, (sometimes Painful, for the latter), etc., at least in Medical Theory, it's not exAcluded a priori that Such "m-RNA" Novel Tools might, Eventualy, Trigger some "Toxic" Reactions "in X Years", certain Medical Experts Warned, according to Mainstream Medias. +More Important Concern, at least from "Eurofora"s point of view : As "BBC" and Others have, Already, Warned, "Proteins", which Notoriously are the "Target" Number 1 of such "m-RNA" Novel Tools, have, Generally, a so "Complex" Molecular Structure, that it has to be Clearly Known and Carefuly Handled, as Any Eventually erroneous or clumsy Change about them "might Provoke Catastrophes !" around the Human Genome... Particulary when such "m-RNA" Novel Tools of "BioNTech" allows "Individualized" Treatment, Special to "Each" Person, Group or Category in the Society, as Mainstream, Professional Medical and/or Financial Medias had Already Noted when Bill Gates Suddenly Invested more than 55 Millions $ in "BioNTech" as Early as Back on September 2019, (i.e. Just at the Eve of a Premonitory "Pandemic" Event Conference that he Notoriously Sponsored at Hopkins University on October 2019 ("Event 201")...
++ At any case, concerning at least alleged "Efficiency", t's Certainly a Noteworthy Fact that, While "BioNTech" and "Pfizer" Initialy Announced an Only 90% Efficacy to the American FDA, on the Contrary, just After Competitor "Moderna" Announced a "94,5" Efficiency against the Virus, ... then, Immediately, they Changed and, (in Only 1 Day's Time !), Suddenly Claimed that an "Error" had been Committed, Modifying his "BioNTech/Pfizer" Vaccine's alleged Efficacy by considerably Upgrading it all the way Up to ..."95%", Back on December 2020 ! (But, Nowadays, i.e. After the Middle of 2021, "Pfizer" Finaly Acknowledged an Efficiency of Just about 91%, ...and that Only for a Few Months' Time : See Infra).
+++ However, it's Obviously much More Grave that "BioNTech/Pfizer" did Not Warn at all, at that Time, (i.e. When USA's FDA and EU's EMA were Considering, Back on December 2020, whether and in which Conditions to eventualy give an "Urgent" Authorisation for his Merchandise), that their "Vaccine" might be Unable to Prevent Infections (by a Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Recipient) to Other People in the Society, (Contrary to what is Traditionaly done by All Other, Real Vaccines, during some 200 Years since European Louis Pasteur's Invention against All kinds of Viruses : 1821-2021) ! So that Both the USA and EU competent http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html, etc). In Consequence, Nowadays, (i.e. Later than Middle 2021), when such a Risk has Become, at last, Obvious throughout the whole World, (Even at ..."Nature" prestigious Scientific Review, on August 2021), throwing Countries like the USA, UK, Israel, etc. into a Mess of Growing Massive Infections, it has Become Inevitably Too Late to fully Rectify things and Re-Start from scratch... The Dangers provoked by giving Credit to such Novel Tools Before any real Scientific Evidence on a so Crucial Point, can, indeed, have "Devastating" Effects, as also the Council of Europe clearly Warned on June 2021 (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coeslamsviruspassrisks.html, etc) !
++++ In Addition, they did Not Warn Even on anOther Important Risk : that for all those Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Recipients of his "BioNTech/Pfizer" "Fake-Vaccine", to get later ...Infected Themselves ! So that when the current US President Biden was Surprized on 2021 to Find that Even several Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Staff ...in the White House had been Infected by the Deadly Virus, he didN't hesitate, among others, also, f.ex., to Block Also such Pseudo--"Vaccinated" Individuals' Entry into the USA by Crossing the Borders of Canada, Recently, as well as to Order "Mask-Wearing" also for them Even Inside their own Family Home's Confined spaces, (etc)... While, in France, even an important New Region's (PACA) President-elect, Despite the fact that he had been "Vaccinated" by such Novel Tools, Neverheless was Found severely Infected, soon After his Election, inevitably making his Mandate Difficult to serve, almost at the Same Time that simple Young Women were Desperately spreading Tears, Schocked by the Fact that they were ...Fired from their Jobs, Because they had been Hired with "Certificates" of being "Vaccinated", but Soon Found ...Infected by the Virus, Despite such "Fake-Vaccines", as those Sold (Expensively) by "BioNTech/Pfizer".
+++++° But, When their Merchandise had been Authorized, as an "Emergency" Measure, Back on 2020, they had Not Warned the People, Neither the Government Officials, No More, for anOther kind of Big Problem, Even More Heavy and still UnExplored in its Real Dimension, which Remains UnKnown : - I.e. that the Duration of such "Fake-Vaccines" was, in fact, very much Limited in Time, Because their alleged "Efficiency" was ...Evaporating too Fast, so that All Recipients would Soon have to take anOther, "3rd" "Boosting" Dose, in a Semester, (and withOut Excluding also the Possible Need, perhaps, for an Additional ..."4rth" Dose, Before the Year ends, as some Officials reportedly just Thought at Israel, under condition of Anonymity)... Medical Experts are Cited by Mainstream Press as Attasting that Such Problems had Never been seen Before in Any Vaccine in the World's History, (and "Doubt" whether the People would Accept to be Submitted in so Many "Doses" Each Year).
=> It's for All those Reasons that Experienced French Professor Christian Perronne Rafused to even Call such Novel Tools as "Vaccines", (Except, may be, of "Fake Vaccines")..., Prefering the more Realistic Name : "Gene Therapy" Tools, (in a December 2020 Publication, already)...
- It's True that some Health Ministers, (as f.ex. the French one), Recently Focused their Claims on Repeatedly supporting that the existing "m-RNA" "Fake-Vaccines", at least, would "Protect from Death or Heavy Hospitalisation up to 95%"... (F.ex., See, inter alia, Also Official Motivation in Text presented to the Highest Administrative Court, "Conseil d'Etat", in the Middle of 2021, etc). >>> But, then, What to say, f.ex., for China's "Classic" Vaccine "CinoVac", which Protects People's Lives or Health from Death or Heavy Hospitalisation reportedly for Up to ..."100%" Each (sic !), according to Official Data of the "WHO" itself, Published since the End of August 2021 ? (It may be true that, Aged People's situation wasN't, reportedly, Sufficiently examined yet in these cases. But, then, all Other Ages are, already, OK).
Meanwhile, however, the Absolute Majority of Anti-COVID Virus' Vaccines having Reached the 3rd, Final Stage of Tests, are of a "Classic" Technology, similar to that of World-Famous Inventor Louis Pasteur, i.e. already Known and Tested during almost 2 Centuries since his birth : 1821-1921 (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/majorityvaccinesclassicbutnotyeteu.html). But None among them hasN't been Yet Authorized by EMA inside the EU... Not Even those which have been Authorized by the WHO, f.ex. as China's CINOVAC + CINOPHARM, etc ! And that, Despite even German CDU/CSU Health Minister Span's recently Expressed view that the Authorisation of, at least, Some "Classic" Vaccines, would Incite several Hesitant People to get Vaccinated... And/or Despite the Fact that Countries where such a Plurality and Diversity of Vaccines exist, Included of "Classic" Technology, i.e. Based into Stimulating the Natural Human Immunioty System, (in Addition to Public Health Protection [Non-Pharmaceutical] Measures), Tragic Errors of the Past have been Bypassed Efficiently, as Infections and Deaths have almost Stopped, (f.ex. in Hungary, San Marino, etc, added to China, etc). Contrary to those Countries where People have been Traped into the Narrow area of Only 4 Fake "Vaccines" affecting the Human Genome, (as Most EU Member States, Until Now, UK, Israel, the USA, etc), where the Deadly Virus Explodes, according to WHO's Official Data...
------------------------------------
Meanwhile, in order to practicaly Facilitate Citizens' Access to the ECHR for the Judgement of such cases, during the few Time still Available Before the Situation becomes Too Hard for those affected, ECHR took,; Today, the Exceptional Initiative to Publish even :
- (1) a Video-Guide on how to Lodge Applications in Strasbourg, (2) added to an Overview of All its current Case-Law on Issues concerning the Virus' Pandemic Crisis, and (3) an Analysis of "Interim" Measures, that EurJudges can take in case of Urgency, (including via Critical "Questions" Raised to Governments, as those which were used in Today's above mentioned affair)...
Interestingly, on this occasion, the ECHR reveals that, Recently, its Case Law Multiplied the Number and the Categories of Cases in which EuroJudges accept to Take "Interim Measures" in order to Face Urgencies Seriously Threatening to Provoke Irreversible Harm.
In other words, they, indirectly but Obviously, Warn that they Might Soon take relevant "Interim" Decisions asap, withOut having to Wait until a Final Judgement, probably Also in such Cases of Compulsory Imposal of a few Controversial "Vaccines" Affecting the Human Genome, (while Still Excluding all the Others)...
Inter alia, this Might become Necessary Also because of an Astonishing Spread of "Hate Speech", recently, against Dissidents, (Scandalously Including often Even Public Officials fuelling Intolerance), which can Obviously Undermine elementary Human Solidarity, pushing towards Dangerous Hate even inside Socio-Medical and/or Public Hospital areas, considerably Aggravating Risks against Human Health and Lives.
(../..)
("Draft-News")
-------------------------------
Main Menu
Pagina principale Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Il Elxis licenza EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
- PACE President Cox skips Turkey Worst (Occupation) case compared to Russia (DeMilitarisation) query
Statistics
Ospiti: 53698801Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

The incoming Swedish EU Presidency (July-December 2009) may still remain in favour of Turkey's controversial EU bid, despite June 2009 EU Elections' results, but it has "very strong demands on Turkey"'s obligation to respect EU Rules, said the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, to "EuroFora", reacting to critical Press reports.
- "I know (that) the link is often made also to Sweden's position on Turkey"'s controversial EU bid. Indeed, "we (Swedish EU Presidency) are very much engaged in the future membership of Turkey, but not without fullfiling all the Criteria".
- "It's very clear that we (Swedish EU Presidecny) have very Strong Demands on Turkey, in a sort of concept for Future membership of the Union, ...which will be a Long Process...", she stressed.
This means, in particular, "the Copenhagen Criteria (on Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law), and also the adaptation to the Acquis of the European Union".
- "If you listen to what Mr. Bildt (the Swedish Foreign Minister) says on Turkey at different occasions, it's very clear : We want Turkey to become part of the Union, in the Future. But we want it to fullfil all the Criteria : The Acquis of the European Union. That's very clear", she concluded.
The Senior Official of the Swedish Foreign Ministry was reacting to critical Press Reports, from Brussels' Journalists invited by EU Commission's secretariat to Stockholm, who claimed that Bildt was abusing of a ..."Whip" (sic !) against Cyprus, by "threatening" the presence of UNO's Peace-keeping force at the "Green line" which separates the island's Government-controlled areas from the territories occupied by Ankara's army, if Nicosia didn't accept any political solution, regardless of Turkey's demands, before the end of 2009.
Governing AKEL Party's new Secretary General, Andros Kyprianou, reacted by declaring that no-one can threat the People of Cyprus : -"We shall decide for our Future, and nobody else", he reportedly said, asking to "keep calm". "In order to find a Solution soon, certain basic Principles must be respected", he stressed, calling those who feel an urgency to use their influence on Turkey. Other Political Parties were more critical.
This was a reference to recently reported statements by Turkish Minister Bagis, Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan and Turkey's National Security Council (a Military-Political body), accused to push towards a partitionist "2 States" solution, contrary to UNO SC Resolutions for Cyprus' reunification.
December 2009 is a crucial moment for EU's appraisal of Turkey's controversial EU bid, because EU Council has decided to review then Ankara's compliance with the European position on the recognition of Cyprus' Government, which was clearly set out by an EU reply of 21 September 2005 to Turkish Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan's claims, refusing to recognize even the existence of EU Member Cyprus, in controversial statements he made to London (former EU chair) on July 29, 2005.
EU Parliament's latest Resolution on Turkey, adopted on March 2009 in Strasbourg, warned Ankara that "the non-fulfillment of Turkey's commitments... by December 2009, may further seriously affect the process of Negotiations" with the EU.
In practice, the issue boils down to Ankara's "embargo" against Ships and Airplanes using Cyprus' seaports or airports at the strategic EU island, which traditionaly hosts one of the World's biggest Shipping flags. EU has already "freezed" 6 relevant Chapters in EU - Turkey Negotiations since December 2006, after Ankara refused to fullfil a commitment it had undertaken when EU had decided to open controversial "accession" negotiations with Turkey, back on December 2005.
- "As far as EU - Turkey relations are concerned, it's clear that Turkey needs to fullfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the additional Protocol (to "EC-Turkey Association Agreement"), This is an important issue....and should be addresseed as soon as possible as it clearly affects the pace of the accession negotiations.Issues covered by the Declaration of September 2005 will continue to be followed up, and progress is urgently awaited", warned earlier in Strasbourg the out-going Czech EU Presidency (former vice-Prime Minister Alexander Vodra).
But the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, dismissed "interpretations" by "some" that Foreign Minister Carl Bildt was reportedly "threatening" Cyprus with consequences on the UNFICYP, if it doesn't accept any solution until December 2009, while Turkey is reportedly delaying in an attempt to impose a partitionist "2 States" solution.
On the contrary, Julin, stressed that "Sweden has strong demands on Turkey'"s respect of "Copenhagen Criteria and EU Acquis".
Meanwhile, Sweden is "concerned" about the risk of "Stalemate" in Cyprus' Talks, but is well aware that "the main responsibilities lie with the two leaders and the UNO", Europe playing only a role of "facilitator".
After carefully verifying, the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, stressed to "EuroFora" that Bildt's reference to UNFICYP "was not linked to a Threat", and dismissed those who "interpreted" it so.
On the contrary, the Swedish EU Presidency acknowledged the fact that Peace Talks are mainly for the UN and the leaders of the Cypriot communities, EU's role being limited into that of a "facilitator".
As for Turkey's reported attempts to impose a "2 States' solution", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service sharply replied by stressing that Turkey must respect the "EU Acquis" rules.
In particular :
- "Basically he (Bildt) underlined that it's the leaders of the two communities in Cyprus and the UN that have the main responsibilities for solving the problem", started to say the Swedish Senior Official to "EuroFora", referring to the above-mentioned "briefing".
- "But the EU had a role in sort of pointing out the benefits and facilitating a little bit the outcome for the settlement of the whole Cyprus' issue", she added.
- "And he did state the Fact, that the rest of the World (i.e. USA, etc) will, of course, look at the differend issues which are at the table, and the future of the UN Peace keeping force is part of what is at the table", she admitted.
- "I understand that some have interpreted that as a Threat, by the Swedish Minister" "But", in reality, "it's a statement of a Fact, that, when we'll look at the differend issues, one of the issues on which we shall have to take a stand on, is the future of the UN Peace keeping force in Cyprus".
Indeed, one of the questions usually raised for a Solution of Cyprus' issue is what International and/or European or other Guarantees, by a Peace-keeping force, might be needed afterwards, eventually for a transitory period.
Questioned anew by "EuroFora" whether (according to critical Press Reports) this could be taken as a veiled warning that, if Cyprus didn't accept any Turkish demand for any solution whatever, it might be left alone to face Ankara's Military Invasion/Occupation, she denied :
- "He (Bildt) didn't say it in that way"... "It was not linked to a threat, or anything like that", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service stressed.
On the contrary, "he (Bildt) underlined that the main responsibility lies with the parties concerned on the island". "The EU can try to facilitate and show the benefits of reaching a settlement. But also, when the EU and the rest of the World (i.e. USA) will have to look at it, they will look at all the Facts on the table, and the presence of the UN Peace-keeping force is one".
And "he (Bildt) didn't speak about that at all", she replied to "EuroFora" question on Turkey's reported attemps to impose, in one way of another, a partitionist "2 States solution".
Asked whether Bildt's aim was to incite both parties to move forward efficiently, she agreed :
- In fact, "the EU is really very concerned with the Stalemate in the situation. Yes !", the Head of Sweden's Foreign Ministry's Press Service anounced. That's why Bildt "was hoping for the two parties (i.e. for Turkey's also) to engage and break, a little-bit, the present stalemate, come to a solution of the issue" of Cyprus.
But, replying to a "EuroFora"s question on the risk, denounced by several politicians in case of strict Time Deadlines, for Turkey to provoke a stalemate and wait for the time to come to impose a partitionist "2 States' solution", she reacted by pointing at Turkey's obligation to respect "EU Acquis" :
- "Turkey must fullfil the EU Acquis : That's clear !", the Swedish Senior Official stressed.
More details are expected when Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt will debate his Programme with new MEPs at EU Parliament's plenary mid-July in Strasbourg, that he has visited already in 2008.
Foreign Minister Carl Bildt became familiar with Strasbourg's CoE last year, when Sweden chaired the PanEuropean organization of Human Rights. As EU chairman-in-office, he will also chair the 27-member States strong EU Group inside the 47-member States strong CoE.
Minister for EU affairs, Cecilia Malmstrom is well known at EU Parliament, where she has been an active MEP of the Liberal Group for many years, following also Press Freedom issues.
Both have already made various statements at "EuroFora", on differend topical matters.
Polls
SMF Recent Topics SA
- Record Hospitalisati... (0) da Breadman
- How Many Infected by... (1) da Thunderbird
- Real Cause for Europ... (0) da Breadman
- Interesting Australi... (0) da Aurora
- Plus de mRNA Faux-&q... (0) da Aurora
- EU: Lukashenko as E... (0) da WKalina
- Why NATO in Ukraine,... (0) da Geopol
- Afghanistan's key : ... (0) da Thunderbird
- Anti-Pass Demonstrat... (0) da Aurora
- Veran - Fioraso : Mê... (1) da JohnsonE