english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow ECHR Condemns Turkey for 17 Years Delay in Judging complaints for Torture

ECHR Condemns Turkey for 17 Years Delay in Judging complaints for Torture

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 28 February 2017

 echr_dome_internal_side_eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- An Unanimous ECHR Judgement published Today Condemned the Turkish Authorities for Violating the Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, by Delaying too much to Start a Legal Procedure against the Turkish Policemen allegedly Responsible for ill-treating 3 Victims, which "remained still Pending, 17 Years after the Facts", without any final result : 1999 - 2017 !


In consequence, the Turkish Government was condemned to pay 15.000 € to the Victims for Moral Damages inflicted to them, and about 6.000 € for their Expenses. ECHR's Judgement being automaticaly transmitted to CoE's Committee of Ministers, responsible for Supervising its Implementation, according to the General Rules, it should  have Wider Repercussions necessitating also General Measures in order to Prevent Repetition of many Similar Violations of Human Rights.


The main Facts originated from a Massive Police Operation in Turkey on 1999 against a Large Group of Persons who were persecuted, (about 100), appearing a kind of Precursor of the even Wider Mass Persecutions of various Dissidents triggered recently, particularly after an alleged Short-lived and Strange Failed "Coup" Attempt of only a Few Hours, from July 2016. ECHR observed that, More than 17 Years Later, on 2017, it hadn't heard yet about any final result of the manifold Procedures still Pending in front of the Turkish Courts until Nowadays, especialy regarding denonciations of Torture, (but also Arbitrary Deprivationsof Liberty, Unfair Trials, etc).


On January 2017, CoE's Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) was Hindered to hold a Public Debate on Violations of Human Rights and the Functioning of Democrartic Institutions in Turkey, despite a Clear Majority pf MEPs supporting a Draft Resolution which Could have Crucial Repercussions against the Controversial and UnPopular Turkey's EU bid, (particularly by Re-Opening PACE's "Monitoring" procedure vis a vis Ankara, which would practicaly mean that Turkey didn't fullfil EU's "Copenhagen Criteria" on due Respect of the Rule of Law, Human Rifghts and Democracy, i.e. a Pre-Condition to any Negotiation for EU Accession), because of a dubious Technicality, (some unverified sources even denounced "Corruption" inside the CoE then), on Pretext that the Turkish Government had accepted, at least, to receive Victims' Complaints to a Special Committee submitted to Judicial Control.


But this Risks, obviously, also to Prolonge for an even Longer Period of Time, the Legal Procedures that Victims have to pursue in the Turkish Courts before Justice can be done, as "Eurofora" and others have already Warned since then (See, f.ex., among others, also : ....), and as it's Clearly Revealed in this ECHR's Judgement published Today, which had been Decided by EuroJudges in Strasbourg, by a Coincidence, precisely during that Week of PACE's Plenary Session here (on 24 January 2017)...


In the Present Case, the 3 Applicants, Members of a "Foundation for Scientific Researcb" at Istanbul, whose Staff and Fans had been All Targetted by a Massive Operation of the Turkish Police on November 1999 (Comp. Supra), had been Arrested and Placed in Detention during allmost a Week, before being massively Accused and Prosecuted for allegedly "Aiding and Participating in a Criminal Organisation" at the beginning of January 2000.


The Applicants Denounced, in particular, that the Turkish Authorities had Obliged them to Sign Fake Testimonies "under Pressure and Torture", Denied the Accusations, and lodged Legal Complaints for Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty, Unfair Trial, Absence of any Efficient Remedies against serious Violations of Human Rights, Discriminations, etc.


Scandalously, 12 so-called "Medical Examinations", by Turkish State Hospital Doctors, to whom they had been Brought by the Police during their Detention, routinely Claimed that the Victims "hadn't any Trace of Blows and Wounds", were "in Good Shape", "did Not Complaint for anything", and so on, (with the Unique Exception of Only 1 Examination, which found that a Prisoner Vomited Blood, felt Dizzy and Pain in his Belly, etc).


But, on the Contrary, 10  Differend Medical Certificates, made by Independent Doctors, practicing Privately, and/or at the University of istanbul and various Medical Institutes, Later on, when the Victims had been let temporary Free to move, Pending their Prosecutions, Strongly Denounced the Fact that all those Previous Medical Consultations were "Not Correct" and "Not according to Ethics, neither to International Conventions", f.ex. because "certain examinations had been made Collectively" ("in Groups"), Turkish State "Security Forces were Present" during those Medical Consultations, while "did Not Exist Any Information on the Complaints" of the Victims, "Lacked the slightest Psychological Examination", while those Medical Notes about an alleged "Lack of any Trace of Blows or Wounds" were "Not Credible", (etc). In at least 1 among the 3 Victims, the Independent Doctors also found an "aponevric Ptosis linked to an ApoNevrosis of the Muscle at his Right Eye", needing "a Chirurgical intervention", added to "Post-Traumatic Stress" and even a "Serious Depression", which "Affected Health and the capacities of Perception", and "could be the Result of Traumatisms allegedly Suffered during Detention", while others had even "Lesions" at the "Head" and "Hands" which "Match their Complaints" for Ill-Treatments, so that "it canNot be Excluded that they have been submitted to Torture".


F.ex, one of the Victims Denounced that, during Detention, a Turkish Policeman had "Crashed his Balls, and, while being Blindfolded, he was Hit several times by his Fists at the Head, and another Policeman had applied Electric Current at his Genital Organs", etc. A second Victim complained that he had been "Tortured" by Turkish Policemen, "Beaten, Insulted and Threatened with a Gun", had "Feared for his Life", was "Blindfolded", and "Told by Policemen that another Detainee had Jumped out of a Window" and Died, (etc). While certain Officials observed, Later on, that possible "Aggressions" hadn't been only Physical, but also Psychological, and at least certain Policemen had been reportedly Accused for similar Torture also in Other such Cases of about 11 Victims, (etc).

By an Astonishing but Symbolic Coincidence, such Facts occured precisely During the notorious "Helsinki Summit" of the EU, on December 1999 in Finland, which took a Controversial and UnPopular Decision to Give Turkey a Status of "Candidate" to EU Accession, which oppened a way for Costly EU Funds in full Grants towards Ankara's Government, added also to various other Legal and Practical EU Concessions to Turkey, which are normaly Denied to all Other Countries treated as simple "Third, Foreign States", provoking a series of Growing Popular Reactions against that, which Resulted, inter alia, also into 3 "No" to EuroReferenda on a Draft EU Constitution in France, the Netherlands and Ireland, between 2005-2007, which have considerably Delayed EU Integration, with the Result to also expose Europe institutionaly UnPrepared to the Global Economic Crisis which Started from 2008, etc.


However, Despite a very Long and Complicated Procedure in front of Turkish Courts, with Many Official Statements and Denonciations, the Identification of some of the suspected Torturers, as well as Legal Complaints from the Victims, Public Hearings, Initial Rejections of their Complaints, Confirmations of those Rejections, Later Decisions to Investigate the Facts, Demands of more Medical Examinations, the Prescription of the initial Prosecution against the Victims, some Official Accusations against at least certain Policemen in these and other similar cases (which were partly Joined Afterwards), New Hearings, New Medical Examinations, New Judicial Procedures, a controversial Court's ruling which Acquitted the Suspected Policemen, various Appeals to the Higher Turkish Courts, Postponements, New Collection of available Evidence, (etc), Nevertheless, "17 Years After the Facts" (1999-2017), there was No Result yet, Total Impunity for alleged Torture in those cases persisted, and ECHR observed Now (2017) that there were even "No News Since 2015" about any action whatever from the competent Turkish Courts in this thorny affair...


Therefore, even if the EuroJudges were practicaly Obliged to Admit that they had not yet been provided with sufficient Proof from that Procedure at the Turkish Courts, so that ECHR "was Not in a Position to Pronounce itself on the Question about Whether the Applicants had been Submitted to Treatments Contrary to the Article 3 of the (PanEuropean) Convention" of Human Rights, (which Prohibits Torture and/or Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, Nevertheless, "17 Years After the Facts", "the Procedure" in front of the Turkish Courts, "against those Policemen allegedly Responsible" for Torture and/or Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, "seems (to be) always Pending" !


Torture and/or Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, strictly prohibited by Article 3 of the PanEuropean Convention of Human Rights, is The Most Serious Violation of all, obviously considered as More Important even than Life and/or Freedom, etc, apparently based on the belief that Human Dignity is the No 1 Value, needing the utmost Protection, since it's the Only Human Right which canNot be Legaly Infringed in Any Case at all, (not even during War, Self Defense, etc), while, on the Contrary, there are several Exceptions for All Other Rights.


Turkey has already been Condemned by ECHR for blatantly Failing to Investigate Denonciations of Torture and/or Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, much More than Any Other among CoE's 47 Member States : Indeed, Ankara's Government has got a Recod-High of ...208 Condemnations for that Violation, during 1959-2016, according to the Latest ECHR's Statistical Data, Followed, from a Distance, by Russia (which has a Double Population number), Ukraine, Romania, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Azerbaijan, Latvia, Croatia and FYROM, etc., with 165, 80, 75, 43, 29, 12 and 10 (bis) relevant judgement, respectively. All Other CoE's Member States have had Less than 10 such Condemnations, and Norway, Sweden, the UK, Netherlands, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Monaco, San Marino, Malta, none at all...


Therefore, the Obligation for Turkey to take also "General Measures" in order to Stop Committing so Grave Violations of Human Rights as that, (Comp. Supra), stands without any doubt, particularly vis a vis CoE's Committee of Ministers, competent to supervise the Execution of ECHR's Judgements from its 47 Member States, (Comp. also Supra). is obviously undeniable, Now More than Ever.


But the Message looks Bleak for all those Tens of Thousands of People, from various political Horizons, (Judges, Educators, Journalists, Soldiers, Civil Servants, Elected Politicians etc), nowadays Massively Arrested and Closed in Turkish Prisons, particularly since Summer 2016, particularly when Rumours and Denonciations of Harsh Ill-Treatments, including Rapes, etc., have notoriously imploded, recently : Will Victims be Abandoned and be Obliged to vainly Wait for Justice to be done in case of Torture and/or other Inhuman/Degrading Treatments for More than ...17 Years, and, even then, only in order just to see the Turkish Authorities "pay" just a Few Thousands of € to each Victim, from the Flow of Many Billions € of Money that EU is asked to give in full Grant (Not loan) to Ankara under that persisting Blackmail over the Scandalous and Dangerous Massive Asylum Seekers/Irregular Migrants 2015/2016 Influx threat through Turkey, added to the More tha 1 Billion € in Grants paid Every Year to that same Turkish Regime under Pretext of a notoriously Controversial and UnPopular Ankara's EU bid, which has become Europeans' Nightmare ? Or, on the Contrary, will, at last, Europe Wake Up, and Start really Defending its alleged Human Rights' Values ?


(.../...)

 

 

***

 

 

(NDLR : Includes Hasty Translations from the Original full ECHR Judgment available only in French).

 

 

("DraftNews", as already send, Earlier, to "Eurofora" Subscribers/Donors. A more accurate, full Final Version, might be puiblished asap).

 

 

***

 

Enterprise Europe Network

Statistics

Visitors: 22462103

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarkozy_merkel_berlin__stras_400

Sarkozy and Merkel : June 2009 solution to May 2005 "NO" ?

 - Will French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel live up from June 2009 to their obvious Historic European mission to revitalize, and re-launch the "European Dream", after the series of 3 "NO" since May 2005 in France, the Netherlands and Ireland, by renewing, and changing the EU with fresh stimulus, big horizons, and values attractive for EU Citizens ?

Whatever views anyone might have, it's a Fact that, recently, EU's political spectrum didn't produce other more charismatic and popular EU leaders than Merkel and Sarkozy, starting from September 2005 and May 2007, respectively.

This trend was confirmed, in one way or another, both during the German EU presidency in 2007 (shared by Merkel with the SPD), and mainly during the French EU Presidency in 2008, (with Sarkozy "free" to move).


The positive 2009 EU Polls are a natural consequence :

- Both with 72% Sarkozy and Merkel are considered by EU Citizens to be "the most Influential" leaders in Europe, by far.

- They are the only EU political leaders to attract a Majority of "Positive" views by EU Citizens, (Merkel over 60%, Sarkozy over 50%, particularly in the continent).

- 60% of EU Citizens find the 2008 French EU Presidency "Good", (and the satisfaction grows up to 67,5% in continental Europe).

The Poll was made by "OpinionWay" in big EU countries as Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, (with the only exception of France), from 26 to 28 May 2009.

sarkozy_merkel_polls_400

But the most important is that both Franco-German leaders seem willing to, at last, really start serious business on EU's indispensable renovation and Renaissance from 2009 : Year of crucial EU and German Elections.

Therefore, this time, the joint European move by Sarkozy and Merkel, which just published a common Franco-German Manifesto, aims to stimulate aspirations and action not only in their respective countries, but also in many other EU "partners", as they say.

Both on EU economy, social values and scientifico-technologic research, as well as on Turkey's controversial EU bid, obviously incompatible with a popular Political Europe, whose Citizens can find a collective Identity and popular Values, they have already started to magnetize various growing voices accross the European landscape :

"Today, more than ever, it' time for action", they stress from the outset.

Facing "an unprecedented Global financial and economic Crisis", "Europeans must get resolutely involved if they want for the World which is being built to meet their Values of Liberty, Solidarity and Justice".

"That's what we want" and "propose to our Partners" :

* "A strong Europe, able to protect us" :

- "We refuse a Bureaucratic EU, which mecanically applies burdensome rules and is afraid of change. We want a European Union which listens what Citizens have to say, which innovates, stimulates".

- "We want a strong and united EU in the World, while also respecting its Member States' Diversity", which "brings Courageous Replies to the Questions of our Times, ensuring our Prosperity :  

This implies to "favor Research and Innovation", "Economic Coordination", to "develop real Policies on Immigrationn, Energy, Defence, and modernise  common policies, particularly Agriculture".

*  "EU must bring immediate replies to the Global Crisis".

- "Lawless liberalism failed". "The Model we want is that of a Responsible Market Economy, which favors Enterpreneurs and Workers, above Speculators ;  Long-term Investment, over immediate profiits".

- "We appeal upon the EU to take, from June, the first decisions to ensure a real European Regulation of Financial Markets, based on coordination and cooperation". "On speculative funds, on fiscal heavens, CEO's and financial operators' earnings, EU must give the example".

- "We call to change the rules of accounts, which are important for our Economy's revival : The competent normative authorities must take action". "The issue of a sufficient Credit offer is of central importance for our Economy". "We don't accept that, during this Financial Crisis, the European Banks' capacity to lend money might be unjustly reduced by Capital's requirements and accountant's rules

* "During the German and French Presidencies, EU has resoçlutely prepared itself for the fight against Global Warming... EU is the 1st and only area in the World to have adopted a package of ambitious and legally binding rules to comply with International Aims"

- "We have now to convince our Friends and Partners, to get involved, in order to atteint, next December at Copenhagen, a Global Agreement worthy of whay is at stake. Our closer ally, the US, but also other big industrial countries, must commit themselves with the same force as the Europeans".

"Green Growth is a Chance ... and an opportunity to create jobs turned towards the Future. Europe must be a leader".

- But, at the same time, we must ensure that our companies remain competitive in the World. The ambitious European involvements on Climat must not lead into a position where EU industry might become a Victim of Unfair Competition. Climat protection and Competitvity must go together. If our International partners refuse to associate themselves to our efforts, we are determined to take measures to protect European Industry"

* "Europe must be more ambitious for its Industry" : "It must favor the emergence of strong European enterprises at a Global level".

- "As long as an International mechanism" to "monitor Public Aids at WTO level, and hinder 3rd Countries to give abusive subsidies to their enterprises, provoking unfair competition", is "not yet set up, we must consider Transitory European Solutions".

* "The current Public Debt is too heavy... We must head anew towards sound public finance, as soon as we'd have passed the crucial stage in this crisis".
-------------------------------------------------

* Last, but not least :  "Europe must play a top-level role in the World"

- "For that purpose,  it needs efficient Institutions. That's why we need Lisbon Treaty". "The 27 Member States decided, last December (2008) that the Treaty should enter into force before the end of this year (2009)". To obtain that, June EU Council must agree "on the Guarantees for Ireland".

- But, "to be able to act, EU needs Borders. An Enlargment without Limits is not possible", Sarkozy and Merkel stressed in an obvious reference to Turkey, etc.

- "In order to be strong, Europe must assume its Values and its Identity". "Human Rights .. are at the basis of our commitment for a Peaceful Development accross the World".

- "For that purpose, we shall strengthen our common Defence and Security policy".
----------------------

* "We are ready to contribute to activate the EU towards the realisation of these aims, with our EU Partners".

"In order to succeed", Europe  "needs the active involvment of all, starting by Citizens themselves. That's why the June 7 rendez-vous is important", and "we are calling all Europeans to vote".

"We are convinced that, if Europe wants, Europe can", they conclude.
-----------------------

Precisely : - What can better forge "Europe's Will" than a "European Consciousness" emerging from political, democratic struggles to face Global Challenges, and open big New Horizons, including by crystal-clear Public Debates, with active EU Citizens' involvement, before the most important EU Decisions affecting People's lives ?

Precisely what "EuroFora"s project warns since 1997-2007, and unprecedented Majority Abstentions, since 1999-2004, added to 3 "NO" to EU Referenda in 2005 and 2007, proved meanwhile..

Let's hope that the Time wasted by some scandalous anti-European and anti-Democratic obstacles of the Past, will stimulate faster, simplified but substantial and persistent, efficient action.-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.