english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Human Life gets Born Earlier, Marks Victorious Turn in Fight v. Deadly Virus+ at House of Rising Sun

Human Life gets Born Earlier, Marks Victorious Turn in Fight v. Deadly Virus+ at House of Rising Sun

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 18 February 2020

  early_born_shanghai_baby_cm__eurofora_400 


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- At an Exceptional Event, Human Life had to be Born Weeks Earlier than normaly expected, reportedly in order to Help an on-going, Hard General Struggle against a Deadly Virus, at the House of the Rising Sun, in China,"Eurofora" learned.

Indeed, a Baby due to be Naturaly Born around the Middle of February 2020, was, Instead, Born with Cesarian Surgery, much Earlier : on the 6th of February, (i.e. 1 or 2 Weeks Before its Natural Outcome), with Risks of Health Issues, at a Hospital of the Chinese Internationalized, Cosmopolitan Mega-City (Similar, mutatis-mutandis, to New York, Geneva, Strasbourg or Saint Petersburg, etc) :  Shanghai.  

"New York Times" Later Published a Long Article on "Pregnant Women" alleged "Problems" in Virus-Hit China, (on February 25 : UPDATED), But did Not Mention Any Case as "Hard" as that on which "Eurofora" was alerted, by well informed sources...

By an Incredible "Coincidence", the Prelude of that Baby's Birth was Full of various, converging Tensions, Anxiety, Risks and Threats, at Different Levels, related to a Daily Growing Deadly Virus' Epidemic, inevitably mixed also with several Socio-Political Issues of our Times (See Infra).

While, Astonishingly, the Aftermath of its Birth was, UnExpectedly, Synchronous with the Beginning of a Real, New Facts-Based, Hope to eventually Win that Collective Battle for Human Lives, as, for the 1st Time, that Deadly Virus started to Decelerate, and Even, apparently, indicating a Trend to be Contained, perhaps gradualy Diminish, Compared to the Past Weeks/Months, (See Facts Infra)

However, Questions still appear to remain Open, particularly about the, eventualy, more or less Harsh Prize, that this Too Early New Born, might, eventualy, have to pay in its Life, and that of its Family, for Having been Deprived of 1 or 2 Weeks Time of Development inside the Womb of its Mother, as was its Natural course, in normal circumstances.

And this was the Family's 1st and Unique, yet, Child-to-be, while China's NHC had Just Deplored anOther Year of "Low Birth Rate" Problems on 2019, which had Already led President Xi to Launch from 2016 a Policy of "2 Children" Per Family, (Istead of Only 1, until then), as an Annual Population "Decrease" Persisted, more or less, (with - 630.000 Less NewBorns on 2017, - 2 Millions Less on 2018, and - 580.000 Less on 2019), inciting the Government to Create a New, UpGraded, Infant Care Service, for Children Under 3 y.o., from 2020.

-------------------------------

Previously, the still Pregnant Mother and the Father had a Discussion with an Hospital Official, who, reportedly, Warned them that, in addition to Notorious "Transport' Restrictions", amidst the Virus' Crisis, the Medical Staff "might Not have the Means" to Properly Care for that Birth, if  it was Allowed to Complete its Natural Course, Up to 1 or 2 Weeks Later, adding that an Early, Artificial Birth might, Perhaps, be even less dangerous for the Future Baby's Health.

The "National Health Committee" (NHC) had, reportedly, Already spoken about "Reasonable Arrangements, as SOON as possible", with Pregnant Women ready for Birth, But this concerned, officially, Hospitals newly designated for Virus treatments, and it had not yet happened in that case.

However, theirs was a Public (and Not Private) Hospital, (that the Family had EnTrusted on a Warm Recommendation by close Friends at Shanghai, Paying something More in order to get Promised Better Services at a Special Department), and, therefore, at least theoretically, Subject to Any Eventual Instruction, by Regional and/or National Public Authorities for Possible Urgent Transfert of Medical Staff and/or Supplies towards the Overwhelmed Epicenter of the Virus at Hubei Province, during the Next Few Days...

--------------------

Indeed, Even if, Until around Middle January 2020, China's NHC had been Routinely Occupied with Various Other, entirely Different Issues, (as, f.ex., "Life Expectancy" Reaching "82,2" y.o. among Beijing Residents, Research on "TB" by Shanghai Labs, or Robot-Asssisted "Brain Angiography" and Surgery for Replacement of Feet's Bones, etc), Suddenly, on 20 January, NHC Officialy Announced that the New, Deadly Virus has been Proven to be "Transmissible" Between Humans, (in Fact, on January 29, it was Proven that such Transmissions Already Existed Since ..."the Middle of December 2019"), while, However, Top Experts Still Expected, Initially, that this New Virus, probably, would "Not" Spread as far as the "Scale" of SARS had done, Back on 2003, as they Claimed...

- But, Since January 21, China's President XI Orders "All-out Efforts ...to Curb the Spread of Virus", Including to "Mobilize All Available Resources", Followed by the "Strictest Measures" are also Announced against what they Called, then, "Viral Pneumonia", on January 21, (with 291 Infections and 7 Deaths then), which "Continues to Spread" and "Might Spread Further". Already, Since January 29, this New (2019-2020) Virus' Infections "Exceeded" those of SARS, Back on 2003).

>>> Most Important : It's at the Latest Since the 26th of January 2020, NHC's Director, Ma Xiaowei, Warned that China was "at a Crucial Time", in its Hard Struggle against that, UnKnown yet, New Deadly Virus' Spread, so that, inter alia, also Public Transport Suspensions and Other Transports' Restrictions might be Necessary, even at Schanghai, in Addition to "Medical Staff" and "Supplies"' Transferts towards Hubei Province's Epicenter, (where +5.000 More Hospital Beds were going to become available Soon : the Biggest, that of "Thunder God's Mountain", with 1.500 Beds, Scheduled for February 6, was Finaly Ready just 2 Days Later, Adding +100 Beds More), Promising for Virus' Patients the "Best Hospitals" and "Best Medical Resources". Before and After that, NHC was Full of various Announcements that Medical Staff from several Other Provinces was Going to Fight the Virus at Hubei/Wuhan.

china_4.2.2020_shanghai_med_stuff_goes_at_wuhan_nhc__eurofora_screenshot_400 

=> Thus, Already, since the 27 of January, "959" Medical Staff from Various Provinces had been Send to the "Hardest Hit" Areas of Hubei (Wuhan, etc), and they were Due to be Followed asap. Also by anOther "1.600". On January 29, about "6.000 Health Workers" were Arriving at Hubei "From Accross China", (Following "a 1st Team from Shanghai"). On February 2, there are "8.310 Medical Staff members From ...Accross China", Coming from "15 Provinces and Municipalities, including Shanghai" (Cited 1st) "Despite Their own Difficulties", NHC Announced. On February 2, "1.400 Nurses" coming from ''NationWide" are Added, and on February 4, the Government "Assigns anOther +2.000 Medical Workers" at Hubei, (i.e. a Total of about + 11.700). To whom, Beijing's Hospitals Added anOther "667 Medical Workers" on February 8, while Hubei Still "Needs +2.250 More"... On February 10, a Total of "Nearly 30.000 Medical Workers accross the Country" had been "Assigned to ...Hubei", and "19 Other Designated Provinces" were due to Send Even "More" ! (This Includes "1.430 Shanghai Doctors and Nurses", "as of Feb 11", when anOther +214 were Added from Just 1 Hospital, NHC Noted).  And Hubei Government Decided, since February 2, the "Allocation of Secure Accommodation, and Daily Necessities" for InComing Medical Workers, Adding also "Protective Equipment" and various "Subsidies", Including "Daily + 43 $" more, (etc).

But, "Medical Supplies", (including "Masks" and Other "Protective" equipments, "DisInfectants", "DeContamination Materials", etc), Initially were, Still, InSufficient throughout the Country, to the point that, on January 31, China was Glad to Receive such an Aid by a Air-"Cargo" from Lukashenko's "Belarus", and on February 6, "Masks" from "Brunei" !  On February 1st, Prime Minister Li Keqiang asks to Give "More Medical Supplies to Regions Hit Harder" by the Virus. This became a Government Policy from February 2, with a "Priority" to "Accelerate" Medical Staff and Supplies towards Hubei, (While "Other Provinces" were "Urged" to organise "Flexible Ways ... to Arrange Work in Other Sectors")... + "20 Mobile Hospitals" are Added "from February 4" to "Wuhan" Virus' EpiCenter". On February 5, the Government announces that  "some Multi-Speciality Hospitals will be Transformed" and "Dedicated" to Virus' "Infected" Patients. Indeed, from February 4, NHC's Focus is "On the FrontLine" (i.e. at Hubei + against the Virus), "withOut Time to Spare !".

Meanwhile, the Numbers of Infections and Deaths caused by that Virus were Growing Each Day, Even with a considerable Acceleration Since 27 to 28 January, and at a Regular Pace at least Up to February 5 included : F.ex., on 28 January Infections Jump from 2.744 Up to 4.537, on 30 January they Reach 7.736, Jumping 1 Day Later up to 9.720, Growing to 11.821 on February 1st, Afterwards 14.411 (2 February), 17.238 (3 February), 20.471 (4 February), and Reaching 24.363 on 5 of February.

In Parallel, Airlines like USA's "Delta" Examine to Suspend Flights to/from China After "February 6", as the "Turkish Airlines" have Already Decided to do so, from that Date.

Even Direct, Open, and Harsh Political Attacks against the Chinese Government, (targetting particularly President Xi Jinping), and Attempting to Exploit the Virus' Crisis in order to Provoke Frustrations and Revolts, had been Launched at the Internet, (rapidly Echoed by some Foreign Medias, as, f.ex. UK's "Socialist/Liberal"-leaning Newspaper "Guardian", etc), f.ex. on February 4, (See Facts Infra).

-----------------------------

=> It's in these Exceptional Circumstances that the Family was led to Accept an also Exceptionaly Artificial (i.e. by Cesarian Surgery) and Early Birth (on February 6), as it had been Clearly Suggested by that Hospital's Authorities for them.

They Obviously Believed that, Given all those Exceptional Circumstances, such an Exceptional Sacrifice (of a Week or More of Human Development inside the Mother's Womb, and of a Natural Birth) Might be the Right Solution for All involved, and that, in real practice, probably they couldn't or shouldn't do otherwise.

------------------------------------

Indeed, Meanwhile, the Numbers of People Infected by that Virus (Both in All China, and particularly at Shanghai), and of those Killed by it, were Regularly Growing, almost Every Day, at least Until February 5, included.

+ Moreover, the Harsh Political Attack against the Chinese Government, and particularly President Xi Jinping, (Comp. Supra), that was Lauched from February 4, at the Internet, soon Echoed by some Medias in the Foreign Press, (f.ex. UK's "Guardian", etc), had Obviously Attempted to Exploit "the Great Virus"' (sic !), as it Characteristicaly called it, in order to Discredit the Public Authorities, Provoke Anger and Mass Revolt, Even Claiming that it was Doubtful whether a Change in China Nowadays could be made Peacefully, and Urging People to "Rage" and "let (their) Lives Burn" (sic !), for a "Break through", (etc), After which, would follow a ..."post-War (re-sic !!) ReConstruction" !

 - Accusing China's Government to be "InCompetent in Dealing with the CoronaVirus", and to have "made a Mess in Hubei province", added to Wider "InOperability", "DisCombobulation" and "Impotence", the Writer of that Pamphlet Titled : "VIRAL ALARM" (sic !),  former University Professor Xu Zhangrun, Destituted on 2019, Claimed that  the Chinese Authorities would be Responsible for a provoked "Economic Slowdown", added to "Isolation" by Other Countries' "Travel Restrictions", and for having "left the country withOut even enough face Masks", and with "CountLess numbers of People Unable to get adequate Medical Attention, ...Abandoned as they wail in HopeLess Isolation", Even for "the ever-Increasing Death toll [caused by the Virus]", pushing towards " a Vast Chasm" where "there is No Refuge from this Viral Reality", so that "Because of this Great Virus, the People are enRaged", and the "Only Hope" would be "that in the Wake of the CoronaVirus, the People will Reconsider their Situation, and...Will Awaken to its predicament", as he says...  

>>> - Interestingly, (while some  Notoriously Suspect a "Labo-Frabricated" Virus, including former Twice-Elected Iran's President Ahmadinejad, "NOBEL" Prize French Professor Montagnier, etc.: See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/ahmadinejadonlabomadevirus1.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/ahmadinejadonlabomadevirus2.htmlhttp://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/nobelprofonlabmadevirus.html), that former "Professor of University",  so Fond of the "Great Virus" (Comp. Supra), Accuses what he calls a "Tyranny" in China's Nowadays "Governance, to be "Undermining a Technocratic System" (sic !), that he Praises, Based on "a vast Corps of competent Technocrats", who would "form.. a Highly Capable Coterie of Specialists and Administrators", in what he Openly Names as a "New TechnoCracy" and Even a "TECHNOCRATIC CLASS" (re-sic !!), seeking "Personal Advancement" and "Self-Improvement" and "Promotion", that would be particularly "Rewarding", in a "Modern Bureaucratic System".

- On the Contrary, China's President Xi Jinping, with an "Instruction" of January 27, had Urged, certainly, "the Party" to "Leed and Unite the People", But, mainly to "Rely on the People" in order "to Win the Fight" against the Virus, ("Scientifically", with "Precision" and "Unity").

=> - Thus, Professor Zhangrun Heavilly Criticizes, particularly the Chinese President Jinping, for what he Claims to be a "Communist Party's ...<<Red 2nd Generation>", with a "ReVival of <<Red Culture>>" and "the appearance of Revolutonary Committees", during "Recent Years", "run by People nurtured on the “Politics of the Sent-down Youth” ["that is, of the Cultural Revolution era—...during the late 1960s and early 1970s", as his Translator in English Reminds], representing "the Worst Political  Team to have Run China Since 1978" (sic !), [i.e., Since the Suppression of that "Cultural Revolution" ; Comp. Supra), and especialy "over the Past 6 Years" ["under Xi Jinping", as the Translator notes], in what he calls a "Leninist-Stalinist", "Maoist Style" (re-sic !!)...

----------------------------

 >>> However, Contary to those Scary "Predictions" of that self-styled "Prophet of Doom" (Comp. Supra), Suddenly, by an Incredible Coincidence, ...Immediately After the Early Birth of that Child, (Comp. Supra), i.e. Since February 6, a Surprizing "U-Turn" Appears in the Fight Against that Deadly Virus, with the Number of Infections Starting to Regularly Fall Down, Day after Day, until they Form a Crystal-Clear and Steady Downward Trend, (towards a probable Containment of the Virus, possible Prelude of an eventual Future Victory of China's Anti-Virus Struggle) !

    - Already, Since January 29, a Senior Expert had Warned that the Virus would Reach its "Peak" in "1 Week or 10 Days" Later, (i.e. around February 5 or 8). This Obviously meant an Augmentation of Dangersous Tensions, Until then, and the Start of a Better Trend towards Overcoming the Virus(' Crisis, After that... And, by an Astonishing Coincidence, those Dates Matched the BirthDay Fixed for this Shanghai Baby, much Earlier than Normal and with an Artificial (Cesarian Surgery) instead of a Natural Birth (6 February)...  

    => If its Family (Simple Private Citizens) might, eventually, had Missed those Medical News, is it possible that Even that Public Hospital's Direction had Nothing Heard about such Important Progonostics made by an Official Public Announcement of China's National Health Committee (NHC) ?     

    + And, was, then, Vain the "Sacrifice" that this Baby's Father and Mother made, (with Even Risks for possible Health Issues in the Future ; Comp. Supra) ?   

    At any case, it's a Surprizing FACT that, Precisely Since that Crucial Date of February 6, 2020, the Numbers of Infections by the Virus Started to Become Lower and Lower, almost Every Day, Both throughout All the Country and in Shanghai City itself !    

    F.ex., while Between the 1st and 5th Day of February, the Total Number of New Infections per Day in China Constantly was Growing Higher, from + 2.212 New Cases, Up to + 2.590 New, +2.838 New, and + 3.893 New,  

    on the Contrary, Precisely Since February 6, (i.e. Just After that Early + Artificial Birth : Comp. Supra), Suddenly, the Trend Radically Changes, and it Becomes  predominantly Downward, with the Daily Total of New Infactions Falling from +3.893 Down to Just 3.697 (February 6), and Afterwards even +3.151 (February 7), Followed by + 2.657 (February 9), +2.484 (February 11), +2.068 (February 12), +1.820 (February 13), +1.506 (February 15), +1.121 (February 16), and so on...          

    => To the Point that, for the 1st Time Since the Beginning of the Virus' Epidemic, (Officialy from the Middle or End of December 2019), Already on February 4, NHC found some "Encouraging Signs", at least in "Statistics" showing a "Dropping Fatality Rate", (probaly After Recent Measures taken Also on Drugs, such as "HCQ, Remdesivir, or Ritonavir", etc., out of an Initial Study of "30" Possible Drugs against the Virus, made by Shanghai's "Institute of Materia Medica"), as well as "Mild Symptoms" in a Large Majority of cases, Urging People "Not to Panic"...

    + On February 8, NHC Officialy Announced in a Press Conference, that "Recovery" cases "Rise" (Including Even of an Old Man, Aged 91 y.o. !), While, on the Contrary, the "Infection Rate" is "Lowering" (See Numbers cited Supra), as well as the "Fatality Rate", particularly After the Recent Massive "Transferts" of "Medical Staff" from "Allover China" towards "Hubei"'s Hotspot.

     - Concerning "Shanghai", on February 10 is Announced that it had Only "1 Dead" from the Virus, out of "295" Infections, (Among a Population of More than ..33 Millions of People !). Meanwhile, "From the 2 of February", the City's "Subway" Transported around "800.000" People per Day, while its "Ground" "Public Transports" more than "1 Million" Daily, (i.e. the 1/8 of its Usual Traffick, But, Still, Fair Enough, Considering Also that this was a "Holiday" Period, with Many People's "Return" between "7 to 10 February").

    ++ On "Cure Rate", a "Remarkable" Augmentation Up to "6,1%" on February 10, From Only "1,7%", on January 27, was Observed at "Hubei" Province Hotspot, according to the NHC, Mainly "Thanks to the Transport of Medical Personel coming From All along the Country", (Comp. Supra). But, Even at the Total of China's National "Proportion of Patients Cured" from the Virus, the Amelioration is Bigger : Up to "8,2%" From Only "1,3%", Between February 10 and January 27 !

    +++ On February 12, the NHC Announced Officialy that the Number of "China's New confirmed Cases" of Virus' INFECTIONS, "Outside Hubei Province, ...has been DROPPING for 8 Consecutive Days" ! Indeed, "the Numbers of New" Infections "in These Provinces, from February 3 to 11, were  : 890, 731, 707, 696, 558, 509, 444, 381 and 377"... And, Later, (after this Number Fell Down to "176" on February 15), NHC Added that such New Infections Continued to "Drop" during "12 Consecutive Days", until Feb. 16.

    ++++ "Fewer New Infections, More Cured !", locaciously Titled NHC's Headline News, on February 12.

    +++++ "Since February 7, (i.e., practicaly From the Early Birth of that Baby : Comp. Supra), Each Day has seen Some 500 Patients walk Out of Hospital, after Recovery !", Enthousiasticaly revealed the NHC in a Press Conference on Feb. 13. (Mainly "Anti-Viral" Drugs and "Oxygen" Support, were Credited with that Result).

    ++++++ For the 1st Time, China's President Xi Jinping, after a High-Level CPC Meeting on February 12, reportedly Hailed "Positive Changes" in the "Situation of the Epidemic", and "Hard-Won Progress" by "All Sides" in the Latest "Results", Urging to "Focus on Priorities", "withOut Any Let up", in order to "Win the People's War against the Epidemic".

    +++++++ Moreover, NHC Announced, on February 19 (UP-DATED), that "China's Daily Number of newly Recovered Virus' Patients has Surpassed that of New ...Infections, for the 1st Time", (since "1.824 People Recovered" Today, While "new ... Infections" were Only "1.749", i.e. Less). In Other Words, New Recoveries Started to OutNumber New Infections.

china_12.2.2020_cured_bypass_infected_nhc__eurofora_screenshot_400 

    => Obviously, All this, Opens a Way towards ultimately "Winning" the Fight against the Virus in China.

    However, that Shanghai Early NewBorn and its Family, do Not Know Why its "Sacrifice" (Comp. Supra), by being Deprived of 1 or 2 Weeks of Human Developmen in its Mother's Womb, and having an Artificial (Cesarian Surgery) Instead of a Natural Birth, with a Risk of Health Issues, practically Coincided with a Crucial "U-Turn" in China's Hard Fight vis a vis the Deadly Virus, (Comp. Facts cited Supra).

    Nevertheless, they have Seen, at least, that its' Tragic BirthDay de facto "Marked" that Astonishing "U-Turn" towards a Possible Victory of Chinese People against the Virus (Comp. Supra) !


(../..)

------------------------------------------

                                    + But How is it Possible for that Hospital's Direction to have Ignored NHC's Official Warning that the Virus' Crisis was Reaching a "Peak" at the Beginning of February (Comp. Supra), so that Soon, things would Go Better, and that Child (as also others) might have been Born Naturally, After Completing its Normal Development in its Mothers' Womb, withOut Needing Cesarian Surgery, Neither Risking to provoke this or that Health Issue ? Why did it Commit such a Big Error ?

    This was an, Apparently, Respectable, Big Hospital, Linked to an Important University, and Founded (along with Various Other Social Outlets) under the Auspices of a late Historic Personality in China's Socio-Political Life during a Long Time in the Past, which had been, in Addition, Warmly Recommended to the NewBorn's Family by a Friendly Couple, that they EnTrusted.

    However, Who was Responsible for the Direction of that Hospital in Real Practice, at that Period of Time ?

    A Press Investigation by "Eurofora" found that, in Fact, during the Last 2 or 3 Years, (Since 2017) it was Directed by a Typical "TechnoCrat", (precisely of that Kind of "Technocratic Class" that Renegate former Professor Xu Zhangrun was Calling to Revolt Against China's Government, and particularly versus President Xi Jinping and the CPC Party, on pretext of the "Great Virus", in his February 4 Published Text of Harsh Propaganda : Comp. Supra), since she had, apparently, done Nothing Else, throughout a Long Life, than to  Exclusively Focus, Selfishly, on her Own Personal Career, as an "Expert"...     

    +Moreover, she is widely Known for mainly 1 thing : To have been Always Pushing towards Giving to a "Technocratic" Lobby the Controversial Power to ...Artificially Fabricate Children, (Excluded from Natural Births), inside their Labos, through "Artificial Reproduction Technologies", as so-called "Test-Tube Babies", of "In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF)", etc, under Various Pretexts ! As, f.ex., the Incredible (and UnSubstantiated) Claim that ...More than 25% of Chinese Couples, (i.e. 1/4), would have Become Nowadays "InFertile" (sic !)... (While Even the UK Experts, usualy Fans of Tech., speak of Just "1 in 8" Cases, i.e. the Half of that). This had Started right from the Beginning of her Career, when, After having been an Ordinary Provincial Medical Student, she Briefly Studied at a UK-Influenced outlet in ...Hong Kong, before Returning Back to her Province During Many Decades..., (with, Afterwards, Only some Short Stays at Cincinati/US or at Kiel/Germany, etc., much Later, Towards the End of her Career).

    ++ In Addition, she Systematicaly Pushes to Give to "Technocrats" Also Power Not Only on the (Artificial) Process of Births, But Even over its Substantial Content ! Indeed, she's Obviously a Fan of "Gene-Editing" and other Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos, (Added to Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening, etc., Practically allowing to "Chose" those who Will be Born, or Not, according, f.ex., to "the Parents' Expectations", and/or if their Genes Match Various Requirements, etc), also under Various Controversial Pretexts : Including, f.ex., the Alleged Recent "Discovery" of "More than 10.000 Genetic Diseases" (sic !), as she Claimed, Suddenly, Only During the Last Few Years, i.e. When Controversial and Dangerous for Humanity, "Gene-Editing" Technologies (threatening to Affect Even Future Generations) notoriously Emerged at the Forefront of Actuality, (at the Latest on 2017/2018, etc)...

    Obviously for that Purpose, she Now Heads 2 Labos, on Human "Embryos" (at Shanghai) and on "Genetics" (in her Province), and has Just co-Signed, on 2019/2020 a Controversial Publication on "Recent" Developments in (mainly Artificial) "Reproduction" of ..."Mamals" (sic !), where ..."Mouses", "Dogs", "Pigs", "ZebraFish", "Monkeys" or "Baboons" (etc), are examined Together with "Humans", particularly on ..."Hyper-Andro-Genism" (sic !) Characteristics affecting Women, (already Suprizingly Apparent at Most of Her own Photos), added to Men's alleged "InFertility", etc., and Various Other Alleged "Genetic" Problems, (Comp. Supra), for which, Controversial "Gene-Editing" Technologies are Presented as if they would be the Only "Promising" Solution of the "Future", Even if, at least Until Now, they Stil Fail by InAccuracy or InEfficiency,  and even More by Serious Risks of "Off-Target Effects", (sometimes "Unlikely to be Detected"), as she Admits, (in Addition to "Serious Risks for Diabetes and CardioVascular Diseases" Threatening More those Born Artificialy, Instead of Naturaly), Threatening to Provoke particularly "Cancers"...

    All that, Added also to Claims for "Gene Editing Technologies", very "Rapidly" developed in "Recent Years", as  "the prefered Tools for Species-oriented Transformation" (sic !), and Various "Adverse Effects"' "Trans-Generational Transmission", (etc), particularly After the November 2018 Scandal of Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos HERITABLE by Future Generations in 3 New-Born Babies Secretly Fabricated by a Chinese Technocrat Educated, Funded, Led, and Publicized by a USA Lobby close to Former "Socialist/Liberal" POTUS Barack Hussein Obama, (See: ... + ..., etc), could make any "Eurofora"-related Person, here in Strasbourg, (Given our Notorious and Crystal-clear Opposition to such Serious Dangers against Humanity) a Probable Target of Hostility, from some among Such Controversial Technocratic Lobbies, where a Possible "Motive of (Any Eventual) Crime" would be Obvious...

- But, What about that Family of this Curiously Early-Born Child in Shanghai (Comp. Supra) ? At any case, this Controvesial recent Director of that Hospital (Comp. Supra), was certainly Conscious about the Precious Value of 1 or 2 Weeks More in Human Development inside its Mother's Womb, Until the Completion of that Embryo's Maturity and its Natural Birth, Later than February 6 (Comp. Supra), since she (that Hospital's CEO) Often Speaks hershelf about the Importance of the "Development Process", of any Still "Developing Embryo", and, particularly, of its' "Timing", concerning precise "Stages", Measured Not in Months, but in "Weeks" or Even "Days", accross "3 Levels" made of (a) Bones, Skin, Arterial network, etc., (b) Organs, and (c) Brain, Nervous system, etc., at the "Outer Layer", (i.e. also the Last)...

+ As for those "Technocrats", that renegate former Professor Xu Zhangrun Attempted to make Harshly Revolt against China's Government, and particularly versus President Xi Jinping, under Pretext of wjat he called "the Great Virus", in his February 4 Published Text of Propaganda,  (Comp. Supra), the Way that this Hospital's Controversial CEO Concludes her Latest Paper that she Recently Co-Signed, Together with some other Like-minded Experts, Focused on Controversial "Gene-Editing" "Applied" to the Artificial Fabrication of Children in Labos, (Comp. Supra), appears Blatantly Characteristic and Typical :

Indeed, just After a more or less Clear (even if, at least Partly, Controversial) Claim that :

- A given Technological "Method" would have "been "Successfully" used for Brain and Cancer tissue sections", according to them, via the "above-mentioned Methods ...(which would be) Useful, But ... do Not provide ... (the Wished) ReSolution",

+ Suddenly Appears the Following Block of Astonishingly InComprehensive Text :

"The transcriptome in vivo analysis (TIVA) approach uses a photoactive tagging strategy for capturing mRNA from single cells in live tissue (Lovatt et al., 2014). Sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (SeqFISH) and multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) technologies are based on single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) (Chen et al., 2015; Lubeck et al., 2014; Shah et al., 2016). "SeqFISH uses a temporal combinatorial barcoding approach. For a given transcript, "a limited set of fluorophores is used, and "the transcript is barcoded by sequential probe hybridization" (Lubeck et al., 2014; Shah et al., 2016). ["CRYSTAL-CLEAR" !!!???...] MERFISH uses temporal combinatorial barcoding with a two-step labeling approach. The encoding probes are composed of a RNA-targeting sequence and two flanking readout sequences, which are designed for targeting hybridization followed by readout hybridization (Chen et al., 2015). MERFISH applies a modified Hamming code for correction of errors in the temporal barcode. Three in situ-based sequencing methods, including targeted in situ sequencing (ISS), fluorescence in situ sequencing (FISSEQ) and spatially-resolved transcript amplicon readout mapping (STARmap), have been reported (Ke et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014a; Wang et al., 2018c). These methods use rolling-circle amplification (RCA) to amplify the signal, and the product is then subjected to sequencing-by-ligation methods. STARmap, in particular, uses a specific amplification of nucleic acids via intramolecular ligation (SNAIL) approach to omit the reverse transcription step", (sic !) thus Increasing Efficiency (-AH !...) (Wang et al., 2018c).

- Did you Hold your Breath ?...

+ Immediately Afetrwars, commes the Final "Conclusion"'s, controversial but clear Claims :

- "In Summary, Scientific Research on Reproductive Biology has been Greatly Prompted by ... Novel Technologies. In particular, ... Modifications of mammalian Germ-Line cell development and human Infertility. In the Future, We Expect that the Continuing development of....Gene Editing Technologies, and their Applications to the field (i.e. Artificial Fabrication of Children) Will Enable ...deep understanding of ...Development and Diseases, which will eventually lead to better Diagnosis and Therapy approaches for Human Infertility. ( Sic ! => IBID, PMA/ART)

++ Follows the usual Mention on :

>>> "Compliance and Ethics :  The Author(s) declare that they have "NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST", (sic !)...  

- Really ? Nobody among them doesn't Head "Labos" involved in Genetic Manipulation of Human Embryos, which Seeks Public Authorisations, Recognition/Promotion, and Funds ?...

=> Such peculiar Prose would Obviously Deserve to be placed Side by Side with ...World-Famous Modern Litterature Writer, ...James Joyce's "Ulysses" Tragi-Comical Master-Piece !

 

james_joyce__ulysses__1921_wikipedia__eurofora_screenshot_400 

-----------------------------------

 

muse__new_born_muse_video_eurofora_screenshot_400

("MUSE" : "NewBorn" Song)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhduQhDqtb4

---------------------------

house_of_the_rising_sun__joan_baez_youtube_video__eurofora_screenshot_400

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD80eZ6Gxz0

------------------------------------

 house_of_the_rising_sun__animals_1964_youtube_video__eurofora_screenshot_400

  ("The House of the Rising Sun" - The Animals (1964) - +21 Millions Views)

 

 

(../..)

 


("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------

 

 

EUHorizonSMEtool

Statistics

Visitors: 51474963

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0634_400

People in Europe and the World expect from CoE to make a succes of its "Monitoring" for Human Rights and Democracy, despite difficulties, said Finland's President Tarja Halonen to "EuroFora" at a crucial moment for the mecanism built 15 years ago by the paneuropean organization which celebrates its 60th Anniversary in 2009.

Halonen, known as "Mother" of CoE's "Monitoring" mecanism, a long-time MEP and former Foreign Minister before becoming Finland's President, holds a long experience in the mattter, after also serving twice as CoE and EU Chairwoman in the past. That's why she is well placed to judge how CoE's "monitoring" should deal today with some crucial issues of importance both to CoE and to the EU.

The move came just a Month before a crucial, last visit to Turkey, scheduled for June, by the President of CoE''s "Monitoring" Committee, Ukranian MEP Serge Holovaty, to finalize his Report on Ankara, the CoE Member State with the longest Monitoring procedure. From its results depends its overall credibility.

This is a Test-case, because, in fact, it's in order to avoid Sanctions threatened against Turkey by a CoE's Assembly's April 1995 Resolution for grave Human Rights violations, Democracy gaps, the continuing Military Occupation in Cyprus, the unresolved Kurdish problem, Aegean differend with Greece, etc., that MEPs decided to create, for the 1st time on April 1996, a "Monitoring" proces, allegedly destinated to check, without excluding Countries who did not fulfill all CoE's standards.

In the Past, the obliged withdrawal of Greece's Military regime and of its "Civil" cover-up out of the CoE had helped bring back Democracy in 1974. But, on the contrary, since April 1996, the idea was to "monitor" Human Rights' respect while keeping most concerned Countries inside the CoE. After Turkey's oldest example, this was extended also to several former "Eastern" European Countries, even if CoE's Assembly has imposed to some of them (fex. Ukraine, Russia, etc., after Belarus, Serbia, etc) various "Sanctions", that Ankara always avoided. Curiously more succesful even than .. USA itself, (a CoE "Observer" since 1995), which has been at least threatened with sanctions some years ago..

EU-effects of CoE's Monitoring process became obvious between 2001-2008, since the "closure" of this procedure, when CoE felt that a Country had met most of its Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law obligations, (i.e. the "Copenhagen Criteria" for the EU), helped trigger Negotiations with the EU for "Accession" or other closer relations : This occured already before the 2004 and 2007 EU Enlargements to former "Eastern" European Countries, as well as for the commencement of "accession" negotiations with Croatia, and of "open-ended" negotiations with Turkey in 2005.

    But a stricking new development are Holovaty's recent findings that on core Human Rights issues as Torture and Freedom of Expression, Turkey, even "5 Years after" CoE closed its "Monitoring", back in 2004, inciting EU to start accession Negotiations in 2005, still presents grave problems.

    His findings are of crucial importance after a 2008 CoE Resolution called, "if need be", to "seriously consider the possibility of Re-Opening the Monitoring procedure for Turkey" : A move which might affect Ankara's controversial EU bid, since EU Accession Negotiations are based on the Hypothesis that the Candidate fullfils the "Copenhagen Criteria" (See above)..
-------------------------
    Holovaty expressed his will to check  "Matters still Outstanding" and  those that he "didn't have an opportunity to discuss" at an earlier visit this year, "in order to discuss the more complex issues in greater depth", at his forthcoming New Visit to Ankara, before the December 2009 EU Summit.  This is all based on the 2004 CoE Resolution which stresses that, CoE "will continue.. post-monitoring Dialogue with the Turkish authorities,...in addition to a 12-points list,..and on any Other Matter that might arise in connection with Turkey’s Obligations as a CoE member state".

    CoE's Resolution also asks  from Turkey "to secure the proper Implementation of Judgements, particularly in the Cyprus v. Turkey InterState case", of 2001, which concerns also the plight of many Hundreds of MISSING People. It adds Turkey's obligations to "execute" ECHR's Judgements in the Loizidou case,..and in particular adopt General Measures to avoid repetition or continuation of Violations found by the Court" to the detriment of Refugees.

    Nevertheless, Holovaty said to "EuroFora" that "MISSING" persons,"might be included" and cannot be excluded, but he has yet to examine the situation "to find out  which issues will be raised" to the Turkish Government.

    Therefore, "EuroFora" asked Halonen, as the Historic "Mother" of CoE's Monitoring mecanism, if she thought that, "whenever there are grave Human Rights Violations, as fex. "MISSING" persons, attested even by ECHR's judgements, they should be always checked by a Monitoring process. Or could they be forgotten ?"
    
     - "We (CoE) must be, at the same time, Fair, Realistic, but not in the mind that "now we have Forgotten", etc., replied to "EuroFora"'s question Halonen, speaking as a matter of general principle.

    - "When we think of those People that are suffering from the lack of Democracy, of Human Rights, and of the Rule of Law", "we should find a base on how to deal with the (Monitoring) system more rapidly"', she stressed.

    - "Sometimes it's very difficult to combine Transparency and Effectivenes together, particularly in this specific case", she went on to say. But, "I have not found a (CoE Member) Country who could be insensitive in this sens", Halonen answered concerning grave Human Rights violations attested by the ECHR.

    - "I have no ready-made answer. I have the expectations that you, in the CoE, will, step by step, find the different types of the monitoring systems."

    Also "because this is a part of the UN's Post-Conflict system, (fex. when it comes to Cyprus' MISSING persons), and it's a more Global system". So that, "If we make a succes in Europe, the others will follow", throughout the World.  "But they expect that we (Europe) are this opportunity, this Opportunity to make a Succes", Halonen concluded.

    In addition, she advised to extend CoE's Monitoring to all its 47 Member States, "because, as long as we hear that, all these monitoring systems are "OK for the neighbor, but not for me", "it's very difficult" to understand. Something which could make easier to Compare...

    Finnish MEP Jaako Laakso, former CoE Rapporteur on the Occupied Territories of Cyprus and one of the 5 Signatories of the Historic CoE's call to create the "MONITORING" mecanism since 1996, was more specific :  - "We (CoE Assembly) have to find a way for the issue of Cyprus' MISSING People to be better followed", he stressed, anouncing his intention to "speak to Mr. Holovaty" about that. "There might be also other ways", added Laakso.

    - The 2008 "Year had been a very Bad one for Turkey with regard to Human Rights in general, and Freedom of Expression in particular", denounced, meanwhile, Holovaty's preliminary Post-Monitoringh Draft Report by Holovaty, published by the CoE on April 2009.

    "Amnesty International believes that freedom of expression is not guaranteed given the various articles of the Criminal Code that restrict it. .. "For example, 1,300 Websites are said to have been closed down by the (Turkish) authorities in 2008" ! While "the new Turkish Criminal Code was used to bring a total of 1,072 proceedings between June 2005 and April 2008, and led to the conviction of 192 people", for expressing views. "Representatives of the Özgür Gündem newspaper, which specialises in Kurdish affairs, ..complained about Numerous Attacks on their Freedom of Expression ...as was everyone who advocated a settlement to the question by means other than the intervention of the army" "According to their figures, 19 Newspapers had been suspended 43 times between 4 August 2006 and 4 November 2008" !...

    Moreover, on 2008,  CoE's "Ministers adopted its 4rth Resolution on the execution of the judgments of the ECHR, ...and outstanding issues regarding 175 Judgements and decisions relating to Turkey delivered between 1996 and 2008...  concerning Deaths resulting from the excessive use of force by members of the Security forces, the failure to protect the right to life, the DIisappearance and/or death of individuals, Ill-Treatment and the Destruction of property". CoE's " Ministers urged the Turkish authorities ...to ensure that members of Security forces of all ranks can be prosecuted without administrative
authorisation" for "serious crimes". Holovaty reminded.

"Nonetheless", Holovaty heard anew of "Several cases of Violence committed last year (2008) by the (Turkish) security forces". Amnesty International speaks of Many Cases of ill-treatment and Torture in the prisons and by the police". "Including, fex."'the death of Engin Ceber, a young man of 29 who died on October 2008 as a result of the TORTURE allegedly inflicted on him by police officers, prison staff and members of the gendarmerie. He was part of a group of people arrested on September 2008 during a demonstration and Press Conference in Istanbul'. Proceedings against suspects are "on-going" in this case.

- " I therefore noted an Obvious Contradiction between the Government’s stated “zero tolerance” policy.... of Torture and other forms of ill-treatment, and the different testimonies given", denounced CoE's Rapporteur.  Turkish "authorities must make considerable efforts to guarantee that proper investigations are carried out into allegations of abuses by members of the security forces and that perpetrators are effectively punished" "In this respect, I have requested detailed Statistics on the number of Investigations, acquittals and convictions in cases involving allegations of abuse in order to show the positive impact of the measures taken to date", Holovaty said, repeating a permanently unsatisfied CoE's demand to Turkey since a Decade...

    - "The Political Crisis that shook the country in the spring of 2008 highlighted the Weaknesses of the (Turkish) Constitution", which comes from the Military regime of 1982, "and the Urgent Need of Reforms", stressed from the outset CoE's Rapporteur in 2009. In particular, "the ...Democratic functioning of state institutions, including the independence of the judicial system, are crucial", he observes.

    But, "the Electoral  system and the ways in which it is circumvented do not appear to give those elected complete Legitimacy, and tend to pervert the course of direct universal suffrage", denounces Holovaty, observing that, even 5 Years later, Turkey did not yet change the 10% nationwide Threshold for a party to take any seat, which is "far higher" than the "3%" maximum in Europe and already condemned as contrary to European Standards by the CoE.

    + Moreover, EU Parliament's 2009 Report on Turkey, drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and adopted in Strasbourg on March, expresses "Concern over the Failure of the (Turkish) Judiciary to prosecute cases of Torture and Ill-treatment, the Number of which is Growing". EU also "is concerned about continuing Hostility and Violence against Minorities" in Turkey. It also "calls on the Turkish Government to launch, as a matter of Priority, a Political Initiatve favouring a lasting Settlement of the Kurdish issue, (while "condemning violence.. and terrorist groups"). EU "regrets that No progress has been made on establishing full, systematic Civilian suprevisory functions over the (Turkish) Military".

    The final results of Holovaty's 2nd and last visit to Turkley will be known later this year, and, at any case, before EU's December 2009 Summit.

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.