english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Virus: Life-Saving Parcel China to France/EU Diverted to UK+Fishy spots, picked by Qatar + Delayed !

Virus: Life-Saving Parcel China to France/EU Diverted to UK+Fishy spots, picked by Qatar + Delayed !

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 15 April 2020
chinafrance_parcel_diverted_delayed_to_the_uk__qatar_airlines__eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- Another Urgent Life-Saving package, related to the Fight against the Virus, send from China to the EU, was UnExpectedly Diverted Further Away, grasped even by ...Qatar (Turkey's lobby !), unecessarily Ping-ponged to various Other Fishy spots (Hotspots of key BioTech. Lobbies with Special links to the Virus), Risked to be Blocked or Lost, and even considerably Delayed, received only after various Anxious, Time and Energy-Consuming demarches by the Lawfull destinators, (to whom many had even Warned that a normal expedition seemed to have been interrupted by a Strange "Hoax", etc)...   

During all that Time, scandalously Wasted, Many Hundreds of People Died in our area of Strasbourg by the Virus, Many Thousands in France, and several Tens of Thousands in the EU, where, in addition, Hundreds of Thousands of People were, these Same Days, Infected.


-----------------

Already, Earlier, a Collective, bigger Package, also of Life-Saving Equipments against the Virus (as Masks, Protective Clothes, Respirators, etc), send from China to France, had been, notoriously, Blocked at Czech Republic, and even Confiscated, allegedly by an "Error"...

Even Worse : Meanwhile, a whole Airplane Payload, expected at a Special Flight organized by the French Government in China, suddenly ..."Disappeared", reportedly snatched by Americans... It seems that it wasn't the US Federal Government, but rather some Private US Companies cooperating with the Public Authorities, in order to Help them in Logistics Urgently needed against the Virus.

=> Is the EU, and even its Biggest Member States, as France, perhaps ...Cut off from China, so dramatically, that it might have become Unable even to simply receive on Time and withOut UnDue Interferences or other Risks, an Urgently Needed Parcel send by Post ?

------------------

This time, a similar but smaller Parcel Send from China to France the 25 March, arrived on 29 to ..London (Stanwell). The 30 March is send a Vague SMS about it, (withOut Phone or Postal Address, Nor Email, Neither Fax, an Empty WebPage, withOut any Reply even after Registering on 31 March to the only Formulate indicated at a Texto/SMS, which was quite Obscure). It's only After many Time and Energy Wasting, Desperate Researches (during which, Official Services Warned that there was something Fishy, probably "a Hoax") that, at last, on May 9, the existence of a shady Intermediary "Broker" was Confirmed, and Once he was Paid 2 Undue Sums of Money, (allegedly for himsef and for an undue UK "VAT"), they send the China Parcel back to France after the 10 of April. It wasn't Delivered to its original Destination in France, but Only as Late as on April 15. I.e. with a Delay of 3 whole Weeks, and a Lot of Trouble, Obscurity, UnExpected Obstacles, AbNormal Zig-Zags, and Anxiety, (instead of just 3 or 4 Days, clearly and directly, as Other such China-France Parcels)...

+ Moreover, the Victims were Surprized to find out (by the usual International Official Tracking) that, Curiously, the parcels send from Mainland China Big Cities towards France, in fact, Transited from Troublesome Hong-Kong, and, then, send ..Out of the EU, to the UK (long after the notorious BREXIT), apparently Transported Not by any Chinese, French or other EU, or any other International Airplane Carrier, but ... through a "QATAR" Airplane (sic !).

The Problem is that Qatar, (Long After having been, at a remote Past, in frequent close Contacts with France and the EU in general), on the Contrary, has Recently been openly Denounced, also by USA's President Don Trump and Many Others (including, f.ex., UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bahrein, etc), to Back dangerous Extremist Islamists, even Terrorism-prone. To which was, soon afterwards, Added also a blatant political Manipulation of Qatar, exploited by ...Turkey, (including even Turkish Military Troops exceptionaly send Abroad by Ankara at an Army Camp there)...

Turkey's own Historic Origin, stems mainly from an Osmanli tribe, which had arrived to Asia Minor, and initially settled at a Small Area in the Anatolia Plateau, all the way from North-Eastern Asia, on the sidelines of the Tchengis-Han's Mongole armed Invasion, during Medieval Times, and had Started to Grow after Systematically practicing ...Armed Hold-ups and Violent Roberries against Peaceful Caravanes Transporting various Goods, Parcels and Merchandises from China to Europe, through the Capital of the Over-Millenary Greek-Christian Byzantine Empire : Constantinople (330-1453).

As for Turkey's notorious Contradictions vis a vis the EU, moreover certain Key European Countries as France, etc., and particularly Against Human Rights-related circles of Strasbourg, they are well-known nowadays...

++ In Addition, instead of being, at least, Straight-forwarded, in that Return from the UK to France towards Strasbourg, via London and Paris, etc., on the Contrary, that Chinese Parcel, surprisingly "Transited" though ...Lyon, (i.e. much More Eastwards and Southwards than Strasbourg : See a Map), where it Stayed for a whole Night, between the 14 and 15 April, (from 20h at the Evening, until 6h at the Morning, Next Day), Before arriving here.

Or, Lyon, by anOther strange Coincidence, is notoriously Home of a Similar Bio-Tech. Labo, (including even Bio-Weapons/Bio-Defense, etc), level "4", almost Identical to that of ...Wuhan City, which became World-Famous as Number 1 "Hotspot" for Spreading the new Deadly CoronoVirus (alias : COVID-19 or, more accurately : SARS COV-3), given also that Both were ...Build by the Same French Company, (as former Prime Minister Cazeneuve had stressed in an Official Speech at a Franco-Chinese event), closely linked to "INSERM" (France's Public Bio-Research Headquarters) and his current CEO, Husband of a former Healh Minister notorious for her Opposition to "HCQ"  (Cheap and simple, already Known since a Long Time, and Free of any Rights) probable Treatment against that Virus, (replaced by President Macron recently), on which Strasbourg's WebNews Media "Eurofora" has Published an exceptional article recently, Dated 3 April 2020... Moreover, it's also a ...Lyon University Professor who is Coordinating, in France, an EU Program to Test 4 or 5 potential Treatments against the Virus, including by HCQ, But in a way which, reportedly, would probably Doom its chances from the start, (See, f.ex., at : ..., etc) !


* To this is Added also anOther, quite Similar, Deviation, Earlier in the UK, where the China-France Parcel was, Curiously, transported to Leicestershire, where it Stayed during ...2,5  Days (from 11 to 13 April), Near to Leicester University, well Known for its "Life Sciences" (Number 1 among its various Colleges), which Include, in particular, its Medical, Biological Sciences, and Allied Health professions' Academic Schools, but Also the Genetics and Genome Biology, Molecular and Cell Biology, Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology,  Health Sciences, Precision Medicine, and Infection and Immunity's Departments of Research. Thus, Leicester University is among 8 UK University Hospital Trusts due to Massively Test People for CoronaVirus' Infection, and is also known for a Project to Invent a Mask which Traps, instead of Expelling, Microbes, in order to Test for infections.

** The Same Area hosts Also Big American MultiNational "Bio-Medical" Industry Company "3M"'s European regional Headquarters, (while its USA Main Base is located at Minnesota, Saint Paul).

 "3M" includes a Big "Pharmaceutical" Unit, (worth more than 2 Billions $ on 2006), and a Huge, Brand New (37,000 m2) Research-and-development Building that cost $150 million on 2016. "3M" has been Particularly involved in Lungs' Respiration since the Beginning, (f.ex. by Producing an "Asthma InHaler" from late 1950ies, etc). It has Productive units in about 37 Countries accross the World, including a Plant for Masks in Shanghai, China.

On 2020, the Virus' Pandemic mixed the Company in 2 public Controversies, concerning Masks and Ventilators : New York asked on March for 3 Millions Masks, and US vice-President Mike Pence, while visiting a "M3"'s Factory at Minnesota, was reportedly told that there were 35 Millions Masks available for Health Workers. But, Later-on, "M3" said that its Manufacturing Capacities as well as Sales' Volume and Destinations, were "Confidential" Data, Not Disclosed publicly... As for its Shanghai Plant for Masks, it would have Sold all its production, already Before the Virus' Pandemic outbreak. Moreover, the White House learned on April that Even Masks produced in USA-located Factories by "M3" would be destinated partly for Abroad. But, when US President Don Trump invoked a National Defense Production Act, asking "M3" to Stop Exporting US-made Masks to Foreign Countries, and to Deliver inside USA a big Number of Ventilators, the "M3" reportedly reached a compromise Deal on such critical Anti-Virus equipments.

----------------------------------

    Perhaps, someone might, eventually, Claim that this Transport to Leicestershire for 2,5 Days (Comp. Supra), might be due Simply to the fact that, at least Some Transport Companies have WareHouses there.

    But this does Not Explain, at all, why, then, it wasn't transported there but Only as Late as ...Immediately After the Lawful Destinators of that Parcel managed to, at last, Find out Who was that Obscure Intermediary Broker, How to get in touch with him, and Paid All the required Sums of Money (even those which, normally, weren't due : Comp. Supra), i.e. After the 10th of April (from 11 to 13). While, on the Contrary, that Parcel had been ...quietly "Sleeping" at Stanwell (London) Airport, During More than ...12 (+Twelve) Days, Previously, between its Arrival to London (Stanwell) on March 29, and its Transport to Hinckley/Leicestershire only as Late as on April 11 !   Didn't they need any such "Warehouse" before ?...    

NDLR : If the Lawfull Destinators of that Parcel had Not managed to Find out Where exactly it was, and How to Activate that Obscure Procedure on April 9 to 10 (Comp. Supra), then, just 2 Days Later, on April 12, it may have been Returned ...Back to China, as "UnDeliverable", (i.e. Never reaching France) !

-----------------------------

Last, but not least, it's, at any case, an Obviously Strange (and apparently UnExplained) Fact, why that same Parcel had managed to Travel ... All the Long way from China to FarAway Europe and even up to the Remote UK in Only Four (4) Days (25-29 March), ...while, on the Contrary, in order to just cross a much Shorter area, from the UK to its Neighbour France, it took as Long as more than Five (5) Days (10-15 April) !

------------------------

=> In Consequence, During all these 22 Days of Scandalous Diversions and Delays (25 March to 15 April), just Here, in France, an Average of More than 681 People were Killed Each Day, in Addition to more than 3.727 People Infected Each Day. (I.e., approximately, a Total of about 15.000 Killed and 80.000 Infected, during All that Period which was Wasted). And this Strasbourg's Area has Notoriously become a "Capital", Number 1 Hotspot of the Virus in France, (Member State of the EU : the World-wide Epidemic's current "Epicenter")...

The Parcel's Destinators could have been one of those Victims, Before its Delayed Arrival. (Perhaps with Symptoms to appear only After the Next 14 or 24 Days, i.e. until the eve of mid-May !)...

 

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------

 

 

EUDigitalMedia

Statistics

Visitors: 45053018

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.