EuroFora
March 28, 2024, 06:59:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
French German Italian Dutch Spanish Portuguese Korean Chinese Simplified Japanese Greek Arabic Russian
News: European NEWS at : http://eurofora.net * European DEBATES at : http://eurofora.net/forum
 
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
61  EU ELECTIONS / Specific Member COUNTRIES' developments / 26% indécis en France ?!.(Malgré 27% UMP, 19% PS, 15,5% Verts, 12,5% MODEM, etc) on: June 05, 2009, 12:27:37 PM
26% indécis en France ?!

(malgré 27% UMP, 19% PS, 15,5% verts, 12,5% MODEM, etc)



Plus de ...26 % d' indécis, qui ne se prononcent pas, au sondage fait pour le journal "Socialo" "LeMonde", et publié par l' agence Américaine "AP", (qui montre l'UMP stable en première place avec 27%, le PS perdant -1%, à 19%, et les Verts gagner +2% à 15,5%, MODEM ayany 12,5%, etc)...

Alors, le dirigeant de l'UMP, Xavier Bertrand, avait raison d' avertir, en disant à ses sympahisants : - "Ne vous laissez pas endormir par les sondages !"

Gare à ce que, peut-être on cache, et/ou peut arriver jusqu'à la dernière minute..

http://www.boursorama.com/pratique/actu/detail_actu_politique.phtml?num=40d51ac815e86f3d2ead69d2a471614b
http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2009/06/05/01011-20090605FILWWW00407-sondage-l-ump-en-tete-devant-le-ps.php
62  EU ELECTIONS / Specific Member COUNTRIES' developments / Re: France:Sondages réagissent aux curieuses declarations d'Aubry sur la Turquie:+1 on: June 02, 2009, 11:47:52 PM
(En ajoutant aussi l'etrange et macabre diversion avec l' incident bizarre qui a frappé l' avion), ca s'empire, allant toujours dans la même direction :

- Après les propos ambigus attribués à Aubry par NouvelObs sur la Turquie (v. plus haut), l' UMP stagne à 26%, le PS gagne + 1% à 21,5%, (desormais à distance de seulement 4,5% de l'UMP) !

Et le FN de Le Pen gagne + 2 points : ... montant de 6% à 8,5 % !!..

Consequences logiques du "brouillamini" provoqué par Aubry, poussant l' UMP au piège qui consiste, au lieu de faire monter, par contre à degonfler et delaisser le débat sur la Turquie, 

 (determinant pour l' avenir de l' Europe, et malgré le fait que, contrairement à ce que raconte Aubry, en réalité, des décisions cruciales sont préparées la-dessus au sein de l'UE, autour dde 2013.. (cad. pendant le mandat des eurodéputés qui seront élus maintenant !)..


http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2009/06/02/01011-20090602FILWWW00625-sondage-26-pour-l-ump-le-ps-a-215.php
63  EU ELECTIONS / Specific Member COUNTRIES' developments / Aubry (ou Nouv.Obs) MENT ! on: May 30, 2009, 11:24:45 PM
France: Sondages réagissent aux curieuses declarations d'Aubry sur la Turquie (PS + 1%)

Etonante réactivité des Citoyens européens en France à la question de la démande controversée de la Turquie d'entrer dans l'UE !

- Pour la première fois après une stagnation suivie d'un declin lent mais persistant ..., le PS monte un point + 1% (=> 20%), de suite après les declarations attribuées à son leader Mme Aubry (par l'hebdo de gauche NouvelObs), selon lesquelles elle "ne" serait "pas pour l'entrée de la Turquie dans l'UE"....
...

=> Mais, une interrogation légitime s'impose, d'évidence :
- Est-ce que la version presentée par le NoubelObs. traduit bien la vraie position de Mme Aubry sur la controverse Turque ?
On en doute...

Quelqu'un vient de MENTIR :

La position d' Aubry sur la Turquie est, en réalité, exactement le contraire : Elle est POUR l' adhesion, (comme d'ailleurs la quasitotalité des politiciens "Socialos" en France, contrairement à 40% de leurs propres électeurs).

L' UMP ne doit pas tomber au piège et abandoner le débat sur la Turquie, (qui est, en réalité, un "carrefour" de questions diverses, touchant au plus près la vie des Citoyens européens : fex. droits humains, cohesion sociale, développement, identité de l'Europe, etc), au risque de perdre une occasion exceptionelle de gagner une grande victoire à ces elections européennes 2009, qui sont, en réalité, d'importance cruciale.

Le fait qu' après les declarations presumées d' Aubry sur la Turquie, Sarkozy et Merkel ne mentionent, dit-on, même pas son nom expressement au texte commun à publier dimanche, (contrairement à ca qu'ils avaient fait avant et pendant leur rencontre à Berlin, qui leur a donné une avance importante aux sondages, surtout en France), pourrait être interpreté comme un signe que les manipulations "Socialistes" d' Aubry auraient poussé eu piège.

Le PS cherche à éviter à tout prix le débat sur la Turquie, en brouillant les pistes. Au Nouvel Obs. il y eu, d'une facon ou d'autre, falsification pour tromper les gens avec des fausses impressions.

Garre aux faux-pas !

64  EU ELECTIONS / EU-wide ISSUES / Bayrou accuse le PS d' "hypocrisie" au sujet de Barroso... on: May 26, 2009, 11:25:18 PM
 

 "Comment les socialistes français peuvent-ils dire 'stop Barroso' en France, et se taire à Bruxelles quand leurs amis le soutiennent ?  Je suis contre ces gangs d'hypocrites", déclare François Bayrou dans une interview à Libération". selon Reuters.
65  European AGENDA / of European CITIES / Brussels' EU Commission's building burnt by Fire ! => Transfert it to Strasbourg on: May 19, 2009, 02:39:20 AM

La fumée venait des étages superieurs :

Peut être quelqu'un brûlait des papiers compromettants, avant l' imminent changement des commissaires ?

(P.ex. le socialiste finnois Oli Rehn se debarassait de quelques preuves de versements liés au projet turc controversé "Nabucco" ?)..

66  European POLICIES and ISSUES / Enlargement - Foreign Policy / Scandale : Le chef des conseillers "Europe" d' Obama payé par la Turquie ? on: April 27, 2009, 01:59:19 AM


Scandale au Ministère des affaires etrangères américain, dénoncé au Senat :

Le chef de l'équipe "Europe" d' Obama payé par la Turquie ?



Le Sénat américain vient de bloquer la nomination d'un vice-Secretaire d'Etat au Ministère des Affaires étrangères des Etats Unis, qui était aussi en tête de l'équipe des conseillers pour l' Europe du Président Obama, parce qu'un scandale a eclaté sur la façon selon laquelle il aurait été payé avec de l'argent provenant de la Turquie..

Voilà, donc, d'où vient la fameuse declaration d'Obama sur l' adhésion de la Turquie à l' Europe, qui a mis le feu aux poudres parmi les dirigéants Européens,  et la disparition du mot "Génocide" Arménien à la déclaration du 24 avril (où il a parlé seulement d' "atrocités" avec "1,5 million de gens tués"), contrairement à sa promesse préelectorale, (comme denoncent les arméniens qui l'avaient soutenu)...

Disparu le fameux ..."changement auquel on peut croire"  ?..


Quote
"...Gordon ...during the presidential campaign, ..served as head of the Europe team in Obama’s group of foreign policy advisers.

Recently, however, he has been a scholar at the Brookings Institution, and has written extensively on Turkey. ....

According to figures released by the think tank, since 2006 Brookings has received $200,000 from the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association, $200,000 from Sabanci University, $150,000 from the Eksiogullari Group (a construction company in Turkey), and $100,000 from the Dogan Yayin Holding Company, a media-entertainment conglomerate...."

http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/i ... 2309.shtml
 

Voici un réportage original intégral :

  "EURASIA INSIGHT

ARMENIA AND TURKEY: LOBBY GROUPS OPPOSING CONFIRMATION OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CENTRAL ASIA AND CAUCASUS
Joshua Kucera 4/23/09

The nomination of a key State Department official responsible for Central Asia and the Caucasus is being held up because of concerns about his views on Turkish-Armenian relations.

At the heart of the simmering controversy surrounding Philip Gordon’s confirmation as assistant secretary of state for Europe and Eurasia is his comments on the mass killings and deportations of ethnic Armenians in Ottoman Turkey that occurred during the second decade of the 20th century. Since gaining independence in 1991, Armenia has pressed for international recognition of the tragedy as genocide.

Gordon, a scholar at the Brookings Institution, had a confirmation hearing before a Senate committee on March 27. During that hearing, he declined to characterize the events of 1915, when an estimated 1.5 million Armenians perished, as "genocide." Instead, he used the term "tragedy." He also said that he was concerned that a congressional resolution recognizing the Armenian genocide would "provoke a nationalistic backlash in Turkey."

The Senate committee proceeded to endorse Gordon’s nomination. But his responses did not sit well with Armenian-American lobby groups, which subsequently mobilized opposition among their allies in Congress. One senator has placed a hold on the nomination, and until the hold is removed, the full Senate will not be able to vote on the nomination.

Senators do not have to identity themselves on a hold, but a Senate source told EurasiaNet that the member was John Ensign, a Republican from Nevada who has co-sponsored a congressional resolution on the genocide in the past. A spokesman from Ensign’s office did not return calls and emails seeking comment.

Prospects that the United States would officially recognize the 1915 events as genocide have risen with the election of Barack Obama. Obama, during his presidential campaign, pledged to recognize the genocide if elected, although in a recent visit to Turkey he declined to use the word "genocide." [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

That disappointed Armenian lobby groups. Aram Hamparian, the executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America, said Obama’s comments in Turkey represented "a missed opportunity." But he said that he was hoping for Obama to use the word "genocide" on April 24 -- the day that Armenians traditionally remember the tragedy. "He has an opportunity to honor his pledge on [April 24]," Hamparian said.

Representatives of Armenian lobby groups contend that Gordon’s nomination was troubling and not in line with Obama’s stated views. "Our concern is that his remarks, his writings and his responses to Senate questions during his confirmation process were markedly at odds with the president’s record on the Armenian genocide," Hamparian said "The president has said that the Armenian genocide should be recognized."

The Armenian Assembly of America also urged Gordon to get his views in line with other members of the administration: "With President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Clinton’s clear and consistent record with respect to US affirmation of the Armenian Genocide, the Assembly expects that, if confirmed, Philip Gordon will fully embrace this important human rights policy position," said Bryan Ardouny, executive director of the assembly.

Gordon previously served in government in the administration of former president Bill Clinton, as director for European affairs at the National Security Council.

During the presidential campaign, he served as head of the Europe team in Obama’s group of foreign policy advisers.

Recently, however, he has been a scholar at the Brookings Institution, and has written extensively on Turkey. As part of the confirmation process, Sen. Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, asked for details on foreign funding to Brookings. According to figures released by the think tank, since 2006 Brookings has received $200,000 from the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association, $200,000 from Sabanci University, $150,000 from the Eksiogullari Group (a construction company in Turkey), and $100,000 from the Dogan Yayin Holding Company, a media-entertainment conglomerate.

Brookings, in a note attached to the spreadsheet listing the donations, said that the "primary funding for the work of Philip H. Gordon in 2006-2007 was provided by the Smith Richardson Foundation. From 2007-2009 primary funding was provided to Mr. Gordon by the Norwegian Foreign Ministry, the Carnegie Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Brookings Endowment."

Hamparian, of the ANCA, said the funding suggests that writings by Brookings scholars, including Gordon and Mark Parris, a former US ambassador to Turkey who also works at Brookings, are compromised.

Melissa Skolfield, the vice president for communications at Brookings, responding to a EurasiaNet query via email, offered a spirited defense of the independence of the institution’s analysis. "Brookings is committed to high-quality, independent research, and all of our scholars share that commitment," Skolfield said. "Our donors respect our independence to pose questions, search for answers and present our findings based on the facts."

Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey, posed a series of written questions about Armenian issues to Gordon. The ANCA provided Gordon’s responses to the questions to EurasiaNet.

In one question, Menendez asked "How does the non-use of the genocide term, as you have advocated, advance US efforts to promote Armenian-Turkish reconciliation?" Gordon responded: "I believe the United States should strongly support Armenian-Turkish reconciliation and avoid steps that could derail that process or discourage either party from participating in the ongoing dialogue."

Editor's Link: Joshua Kucera is a Washington, DC,-based freelance writer who specializes in security issues in Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Middle East.

Posted April 23, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org "
67  EU ELECTIONS / Specific Member COUNTRIES' developments / France : les errements de "Libération", pardon : "Libe"l"ation"... on: April 20, 2009, 02:22:34 AM
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/libelation.html
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!