english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow In Brief arrow European protection of Human Rights threatened by Turkey-inspired restrictions ?!

European protection of Human Rights threatened by Turkey-inspired restrictions ?!

Written by ACM
Thursday, 12 April 2012

 

 cedh_book__400

(Opinion)

The pan-European system of protection of Human Rights is obviously threatend currently by pressure to modify it in order to impose some controversial, and mostly scandalous retrictions against individuals' right to lodge a complaint before the Strasbourg's Court, which risk to be, totally or partially, adopted  or endorsed, later this week, at a CoE Ministerial session in Brighton (UK), according to a list dressed a year earlier in .. Turkey, i.e. the State which notoriously commits the most numerous and grave violations...


Including the imposition, for the 1st time, of the obligation to pay Fees, to hire a Lawyer, etc., in addition to the possiblity to reject an application to the ECHR by decision of only one individual alone, who is not even an EuroJudge, such potential Restrictions to Victims of serious of Human Rights violations, go as far as to hinder ECHR from considering any application which has been simply considered by a National Court in the State accused to have committed those violations !


Many International Human Rights Organizations, the ECHR itself, several key CoE Member States, etc. have already started to protest, denounce and react against such a dangerous onslaught against the ECHR, but the remaining Time is too short in order to be sure to prevent the worse, and some manoeuvered even on the choice of the precise Dates in order to exclude practically all those who notoriously follow EU Parliament's plenary Sessions, French Presidential Elections, etc....


It's as early as already since the 1960ies that an experienced former Director on Human Rights at the CoE had notoriously reacted to serious, brutal and deadly violations of Human Rights as well as blatant disrespect of elementary principles of Democracy by the Turkish Authorities by concluding that Turkey had No place inside the paneuropean CoE, (particularly once the exceptional politico-military concerns of the former 1948-1952 "Cold War" Division of Europe had ended). And History will never forget the astonishing spectacle of the then ECHR President, Professor Costa, launch a desperate appeal last year (2011) from Izmir (nowadays Turkey) to at least respect ECHR's dignity, authority and independence...


However, the current British CoE presidency tries to prepare also other, positive measures in order to tackle at least the scandalous, and more and more problematic reluctance and/or delay to execute ECHR's judgements, which aggravates seriously ECHR's overload by provoking an otherwise useless multiplication of justified individual applications in repetitive and similar cases against violations which have been already condemned by the ECHR, but, nevertheless,  persist to be committed by the condemned State...   


But, even in this crucial issue too, recently published CoE's data reveal that Turkey is (by far) the No 1 culprit, both for delaying and  for refusing in practice to implement ECHR's judgements...


=> Quo Vadis Europe ?

 

(Comp. "EuroFora"s NewsReports from the exceptionaly important, Founding CoE Ministerial Conference which launched ECHR's reform process at Interlaken, Switzerland, since February 2010)

1st european sme week 2009

Statistics

Visitors: 4425371

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

cedh_press_conflistening_agg

ECHR's President to "EuroFora" on Journalists Gongadze and Adali murders : Principles must apply to all States, without discrimination.


+ ECHR's Statistics on Freedom of Expression (See below).


 European Court of Human Rights' President, Jean-Paul Costa, questioned by "EuroFora" on Journalists' murders, as in Gongadze and Adali's cases etc., strongly stressed all CoE Member States' obligation to make efficient Investigations to find and punish those responsible, and underlined that ECHR's case-law's principles must apply to all without any discrimination.

His call was clearly supported by various Top MEPs who denounced a risk of "Double Standards" if some Journalists' murders are investigated, while others don't.

To avoid such risks, CoE's Parliamentary Assembly adopted a Resolution, on the occasion of Ukranian Journalist Gongadze's murder, "stressing", as a matter of general Principle, "the importance it attaches to the safety of Journalists and political activists, especially those linked to opposition groups, in ALL member states of the CoE". All "crimes against journalists and political activists must be investigated ... as a matter of priority, without political interference".

Costa was replying to "EuroFora"s question on the fact that, after CoE's Committee of Ministers, also CoE's Assembly had just adopted a Resolution on Gongadze murder case, based on an ECHR's judgement of 2005, asking a full Investigation from Ukraine, who has found and condemned  in 10 years of jail 2 executants, but not yet the instigators.

While nothing similar was yet done for dissident Turkish Cypriot Kutlu Adali's murder, with 5 bullets shot at his head out of his Family's home in the territories of Cyprus occupied by Ankara's army, despite another ECHR's judgement of the same year 2005, and despite Turkey's claim that nobody was found among those responsible for the murder, and that there was nothing more to do..

In order to be credible and efficient, CoE's mechanisms shouldn't find a way to at least ask for full investigations of all Journalists' murders anywhere they might be committed, without exceptions ?

adali_gongadze


- "On the larger question that you raised, I'd like to say, since we are in a period of stock-taking on ECHR's 50 Years, that the Court's case-law developed certain concepts ....such as the Positive obligations of States, part of which are also the procedural obligations", started to reply ECHR's President.

 - "Whenever Journalists, Lawyers, Defenders of Human Rights, or even simple Citizens are murdered, the States are held responsible, not only if its their own security forces' agents who committed these murders, but also if they didn't make sufficiently substantial and efficient Investigations", he stressed.

- "I want to strongly underline that we (ECHR) have found in many cases numerous violations of Articles 2 and 3 against States, ....(about) murders or torture, ...because they didn't make enough Investigations in order to try to find and punish those responsible".

- "We (ECHR) do that vis-a-vis all 47 (CoE) Member States, without any discrimination".

"Naturally, the circumstances in each particular case may be differend, and we can't ommit to apply the rules of proof, or the rules of criminal procedure".

"But we try, by all means, to apply these principles of our case-law, to all States", he concluded.

imag0335_400


      Costa's call was strongly supported by several Top CoE MEPs, from various Political areas


- "To investigate the murder of one Journalist, and not of another, looks like Double Standards", denounced the President of EuroLeft Group in CoE's Assembly, Dutch MEP Tiny Cox.  

- "What is the reason ? Politics or specificity of a case ? Of course, if Cyprus and Turkey are involved, it's always a Political case"..

- "Murders of Journalists should always be fully investigated, because killing Journalists is not only killing persons, but also killing Free Press".  "We (CoE's Assembly) should do our outmost to help People who are working on Free Press and they are under threat or murdered".

Because for Free Politics, Free Press is a pre-requisitive : Parliamentarians  cannot  function without a Free Press. Not investigating, is not protecting ourselves".

So we should investigate all Journalists' murders : We are talking about Gongadze, about the Cypriot man (Adali), about the Journalist murdered in Moscow one week ago, etc", Cox concluded

- "CoE can' look at these cases differently. CoE can't wear Blinckers  !".
- "If the one is investigated, so has to be also the other. Why there wasn't full investigation ? Why's that ?", wondered British  Socialist MEP, Alan Meale.

- "A good idea" would be to "make a Motion for Resolution", and "join all Journalists' murders. Adali and Gongadze etc", said to "EuroFora" EU Parliament Political affairs Committee's President, Goran Lindbland, ChristianDemocrat MEP from Sweden.


(See also earlier News at "EuroFora" on similar issues).
-------------------------------

ECHR's Statistics on Freedom of Expression :


    Almost Half of condemnations by ECHR for violations of Freedom of Expression in 2008, concern Turkey : 20 out of a total of 48 for all CoE's Member States.

    Russia, Poland, France and Moldova were condemned only 3 times. Romania, Greece, Portugal, 2 times, and the other CoE Member States only 1 time, or none.
--------------------
    During the last Decade : 1998 - 2008, Turkey was condemned for violating Freedom of Expression in ..169 cases, while Austria only in 24.

    France and Moldova in 14 and 13, respectively, closely followed by Russia and Poland with 11 and 10, respectively. The rest of CoE Member States had less than ten condemnations.    
    

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.